316
New Trump leak suggests Iran is still hacking former president's campaign
(www.usatoday.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
316 points (97.0% liked)
World News
38627 readers
2267 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I'm kind of leaning towards the idea that the US government should offer secure IT services to campaigns, because this is a problem for the country, not just the people involved.
Like, a campaign alone probably cannot counter nation-state intelligence agencies acting against them.
And the problem is larger than just "a country might try to undermine someone's campaign".
Having damning material to blackmail a President would be a problem, even if the material comes from activity prior to time as a President. We do not want that.
EDIT: l'd also add that this isn't just a problem for the US. Leaders in general, but particularly leaders of democracies, where popularity determines who holds power, face that as a risk factor.
It's not an entirely new problem in the Internet era, but I think that the problems are tremendously exacerbated by having a lot of sensitive information living on very complicated machines connected to a globally-accessible network.
You can have the best cybersecurity team in the world and they still wouldn't be able to do anything about a dementia patient this stupid. His passwords are dumb shit like "MAGA2020" maybe with an exclamation mark.
cybersecurity is only as strong as its weakest link. I don't expect him to follow anything that he is recommended to do by experts for something as complicated as computers, lol
They tried to give him a government iPhone and he refused. He kept using his insecure device instead.
I'm of the opinion that the alleged billionaire with his own cryptocurrency and publicly traded tech company should be able to afford a security guy.
Why not just hire cyber ninjas?
to be fair, though politicians are usually rich, we dont want a system wherein they have to be rich, or where compromising information on a high level politician gets to a hostile power just because while said politician was running they were a cheapskate about who they hired for security
Because they require payment upfront lmao
They already do. Part of the problem is that the candidates themselves don't want to comply, for fear of someone in the secret service leaking.
This goes back to Clinton sneaking around behind the back of his detail to get head and Cheney maintaining a secret vault of physical files to skirt rules on disclosure.
J. Edger Hoover would consider it extremely useful, particularly if he needed to tighten the leash.
Depending on who you believe, your bosses having Compromat on you is practically a prerequisite for climbing the ladder.
This is not about the need for government support, this case is solely a case of gross incompetence in IT.
If one gets hacked, one makes dead sure that the hole where the attacker entered and all the holes the attacker created afterwards are thoroughly taken care of.
Yes, I do not want a president. The fact that they can all be blackmailed is just one reason among countless.
The only problem with the damning material prior or not, is that it happened in the first place.
If a future president has something so damning they could use it for blackmail, we should all know and be thankful it was bought to public light.
Setting aside the general problems with being able to split the interests of a leader away from that of the country he leads, blackmail doesn't entail simply releasing information, but rather agreeing to refrain from doing so in exchange for some action that would not otherwise have been taken. Say a President agrees to do something against the interests of the public in exchange for the non-disclosure of information.
Yes, this is a small part of why so-called "representative" democracy is a joke. It depends entirely on people who are completely controllable.
More reason to push to disclose as much information as possible, not give state protection to hide it.
The government buys IT services from the same companies that everyone else does: Google, Microsoft and Amazon. They all offer special government offerings with stricter security.
I guarantee Trump is getting hacked because he and his team refuse to listen to IT and won't let them turn on basic security features because they're a slight inconvenience.
Might be able to do that by extending the responsibilities of the secret service for such things. Or having the NSA on top of that shit.