162

Harris to speak about abortion in Georgia, seeking to tie deaths of two women to Trump policies (abcnews.go.com)

submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You’ll stick with the theory an innocent death is for the the greater good until it’s your innocent death.

I never said the death was for good. Nor have I said that it'd be immoral for a doctor to break the law. The death is because of a horrible legal reality and a doctor that complies with the law isn't some sort of monster. There are justifications for that decision, but you won't respect them. I am not some moral absolutist like you appear to be. Things can be murky.

You could make the same argument that someone without insurance or means should be denied access because the hospital needs only paying customers to stay in business.

I could, but I'm not making that argument. In fact, I argue strongly that the entire healthcare industry should be nationalized and paid by taxes. Just because that's my desired outcome doesn't mean that I turn around and shame doctors and nurses for working for more than minimum wage. Which is effectively what you are saying "These doctors are making healthcare expensive for all because of their salaries. They should work for free!"

In the exact same vein, I argue that abortion should be legal and highly available. But that's not the environment I or doctors find themselves in. So, sorry, I'm not going to fault doctors for not playing hero.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024

162 points (98.2% liked)

politics

18898 readers

3320 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News