this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3084 readers
107 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

1987 smoking banned in London public transport following the deaths of 31 people in a fire

2005 banned in nationwide public transport

2008 banned in enclosed public spaces

2018 banned in prisons

I'm curious do you think they're all stupid or just this one? Isn't this one just an extension of "please don't smoke directly in front of the hospital doors" for other public places?

What about the proposed plans to raise the smoking age year on year every year?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Banning smoking in prisons was insane. It was pioneered by "failing" Chris Greyling and essentially created a whole new category of contraband. I was watching a Business Insider doc on youtube about this and a former prisoner was saying that since this policy came into place, a pack of cigarettes is now valued at hundreds of pounds when traded between prisoners.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

An enclosed space is very different to outside. That's why you don't run your car indoors.

Should we ban pubs from having car parks? Since the exhaust fumes are quite toxic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Lots of pubs don't have car parks though so what's your point?

Just so you understand, the reason that smoking outside should be banned is not because smoking is bad (although obviously objectively it is and you shouldn't do it) but smoking near me is bad, and I am occasionally outside at the same time as you are outside. If you want to go smoke in the middle of a field, be my guest. Your life choices should not affect me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Should we ban [cars]

I mean, disregarding the feasibility, political polularity and media optics of it, for the continuation of earths ecosystem... probably yeah

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

Are you a little bit slow? You don't see the difference between indoor and outdoor?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely brilliant.

Smoking is a choice and you're choosing to make it someone else's problem by smoking at pubs

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

By definition a substance use disorder is not a choice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

The choice is blowing smoke in public places, not craving nocotine

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's mentally addictive not physically addictive so no that's not a defense

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Hate to break it to you but smoking is definitely physically addictive

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Absolutely authoritarian.

Education campaigns are far more effective with far less pushback than draconian bans. Let people choose for themselves.

I remember constant campaigns in the past trying to convince the public of the ills of smoking, and it (slowly) appeared to be working. Then vaping came along, and instead of continuing the education campaigns, the health departments tactics seemed to change to "take up vaping, it's better than smoking".

And now, it may just be anecdotal, but smoking appears to me at least, to be on the rise again. I wonder why?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Sounds like the same argument against banning smoking in pubs, which is probably the single greatest health intervention in the last fifty years and now supported by basically everyone.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

Yeah bloody government, making laws, making people's lives better, how dare they.

I liked it back in the old days when 4-year-olds worked down the pit and no one back an eyelid, and then died quietly of tuberculosis. Snowflakes these days....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is it? Second hand smoking still fucks you up, and it's not like being outside completely fixes that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Car pollution fucks you up, too, probably more so. And before you say "people need cars to get places", nicotine (and caffeine) fuelled the industrial revolution - nicotine makes your brain work faster, which can make people more productive.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah and that's why we have congestion charges and emissions zones and catalytic converters and environmental regulations on cars, to reduce the pollution that people are breathing in.

FYI I'm not in favour of ever banning smoking completely. The freedom to damage yourself is just as important as the freedom to not be damaged by someone else.