this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
551 points (97.3% liked)

WTF

791 readers
1 users here now

The average c/WTF enjoyer

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Just some numbers to put into relation :

| Casualties |

Hiroshima:- 90,000–166,000 killed

  • 80,000–156,000 civilians
  • 10,000 soldiers
  • 12 Allied prisoners of war

Nagasaki:- 60,000–80,000 killed

  • 60,000–80,000 civilians
  • 150 soldiers
  • 8–13 Allied prisoners of war

Total killed (by end of 1945): 150,000–246,000

Source: Wikipedia - Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Hiroshima:- 90,000–166,000 killed
80,000–156,000 civilians

And modern nukes are SIXTY TIMES more powerful than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Not just that, but far more of them. And also missiles that consist of dozen of smaller warheads inside

And these missiles can travel to literally any place on earth, no matter where they started, as they follow a sub-orbital trajectory into space

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

And then, in the aftermath of the decision to wipe those cities off the map, the United States said "That worked great. Let's make thousands more of those."

This country is vomitous.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, the US and every other 1st world country. Nobody wants to be the guy without nuclear weapons when the nuclear war starts - the ones that can't defend themselves would be easy first targets. That's what the cold war was all about - 2 countries, each just waiting for the other to drop the bomb they're sure is coming eventually.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The thing is, the MAD doctrine works. We enjoy relatively more peace than we had before.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

It works until it catastrophically fails. That's the gimmick. You can partly offset the risk by bringing the overall nuke count down to dozens or hundreds per country, but only partly. And how many dictators want to create a small nuclear arsenal these days? It's the only way to keep others out. Which brings the risk back up.