this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
1345 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

2700 readers
38 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

To clarify, the pictured poster Caroline Kwan is an ally, not a TERF. The TERFs referred to in the title are the ones ‘protecting a very specific idea of what a woman is’

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Is "christian" not a common set of common traits? Are Christians not of the largest religion?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They are, but they're not remotely as dominant on a global scale at 31% as things like "has XX chromosomes" or "has female sex organs" or "produces little testosterone and comparatively large amounts of estrogen" are for women as a group.

Because religion tends to be much more regional than that - for example the US is about 2/3 Christian and one can expect that if you grab a random person off the street they are at least passingly familiar with the broad strokes of what Christianity is, can recognize the most major Christian symbols, are familiar with Christian holidays, etc even if they themselves are not a devout Christian because of the impact the normality of Christianity has on the culture. The same thing applies to Islam in say Saudi Arabia. Or Shinto or Buddhism in Japan.

Again, normality is not morality. It's just resembling the statistical mode. Often the least normal things about people are the best parts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

...but not when it's a "masculine" woman who is good at sports that is competing against other women?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Didn't say that, my involvement in all this started with the question of what another poster meant by "vanilla women".

Personally I think the question of where to draw the lines is going to be particular to the sport, since the whole point of women's leagues in the first place is protectionism for women athletes who would otherwise just be dominated in many sports by male athletes out of a sense of fairness and no one was even thinking about trans or intersex athletes at the time.

So how intersex is too "masculine" to be a "fair" competition is going to depend on the sport, as is what guidelines are required for trans women to be "fair" competition against the protected class of cis women.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Except this is all thread about someone who, as far as we know, is just a woman. A woman who people just decided wasn't a woman because she had masculine features and was really good at boxing.