this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
1159 points (97.9% liked)

General Discussion

12044 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


πŸͺ† About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: [email protected]!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


πŸ’¬ Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with β€˜silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to [email protected] or [email protected] communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

@LMAO is flooding the site with random communities because they're salty about being banned for claiming too many community names. They claim they're trying to "fuck your entire site up" but I imagine it's a relatively quick fix to delete all the communities they're creating, LMAO.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They need to start email verification. It will slow the trolls down.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Doesn't help too much, you can generate infinite email accounts with gmail for an example.

Manual acceptance of each and every user helps, but it's not sustainable.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't even need that, 1 click temporary email boxes everywhere

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's what I used.... I have no intention of being a troll or asshole, but I don't want social media like this platform linked to me IRL and never have.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Personally I just use a dumping ground email address. Just an address i use for any website I don’t particularly trust that I never look at unless I know there’s a confirmation email waiting for me

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, but a common thing websites do is block those domains, at least the easier to find ones. Nearly nobody blocks gmail.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could block using + in a Gmail address.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Some sites do this and it's annoying. A better check is to compare the part before the + if it's Gmail.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's probably better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can add a . anywhere in the username part of a GMail address. [email protected] is the same as [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whether or not Lemmy supports this at this point, I dunno, but it's easy enough to code your username verification to remove all +s and periods before continuing to ensure uniqueness.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Period can be removed with gmail emails. However, for +s, the whole part after + and before @ needs to be removed if removing+ as that part indicates the folder emails come to. Yet, the same issue would still remain for any Google Workspace emails as they also support + but doesnt end with gmail domain.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, you corrected my logic on the +. Thanks for the added insight on the Google workspace.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is not actually true. The + method works, but not the . method.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Not if you filter out . and + in gmail addresses.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In any address. Most email services support + and a few support . as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I use .in my email addresses with no malicious intent

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure but in gmail addresses, the dots are ignored, and anything after the + is also ignored. You can add as many dots as you want and will still go to the same address.