this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
27 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4065 readers
198 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Lenders to Thames argue that forcing them to incur losses on their debts would also drive up the cost of borrowing for all UK water companies, and potentially other utilities such as gas and electricity.

Lol, get fucked.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Basically admitting they lend to companies with bad fiscal policy. Based on expecting UK tax payers to fund the debt.

But honestly what worries me more. The gov has nothing to lose. They know they cannot win the next election. At best they can minimise the losses. So burdening the next gov with debt dispite public hate for privrate utilities as a whole. Can not really harm them.