Technology

59598 readers

3536 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

377

Redditors Vent and Complain When People Mock Their "AI Art" (futurism.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

264 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Setting aside the usual arguments on the anti- and pro-AI art debate and the nature of creativity itself, perhaps the negative reaction that the Redditor encountered is part of a sea change in opinion among many people that think corporate AI platforms are exploitive and extractive in nature because their datasets rely on copyrighted material without the original artists' permission. And that's without getting into AI's negative drag on the environment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

All it takes to write a book is to string some words together?

Flagpole masonry tick Persepolis a reciprocity.

I'm an author!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

See, now you're getting it!

[+] [email protected] -8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You are. A crappy one, but you’re an author. Try to do better.

Gatekeeping words like “artist” and “author” is very nasty. My 3 year old makes art. He’s bad at it but if I tell him he’s not an artist he’ll stop and who knows what could have happened. I choose to encourage him.

He also write like you did. And I encourage him to do better.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't think saying "if you put random words together with no context, you're not an author" is gatekeeping. It's defining a term.

And I absolutely gatekeep the idea that anyone's three-year-old is an artist or an author. Those are things that take skill.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My friend always said “if you can’t see it live with instruments it’s not music and they’re not musicians” and I disagreed with that for the same reason I disagree with you saying making art takes skills. I hope that makes sense. Making good art and popular art might take skill, but anyone can be an artist, anyone can be an author. “Anyone can cook.”

We can agree to disagree.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So a person who picks up a saxophone for the very first time is a musician? Really?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Sure, why not. Art teachers always defined art as the expression of an idea, and playing the saxophone for the first time is definitely that. Talent, time, skill and knowledge does not enter in this label as far as I’m concerned.

Now you’re not John Zorn but, hey, maybe you’ll be later with some perseverance and dedication. Edit: Or maybe you’ll become Duke Silver and you’ll be happy enough doing that. We need both in the world.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I disagree with the other poster, I'd say your child is an artist making maybe the purest form of art in the world, taking their life experience and putting it to paper. I'd dare to say that letting them type out a random prompt and getting a decent image out of their limited vocabulary would be much less impactful than the most crude stick figure drawing of the two of you together.