wile_e8

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well, I made it.

Notes:

  • I did add a whole small can of tomato paste (6 oz), and given how red it is, I probably would have been fine with a couple scoops.
  • I forgot to add the beef and stir it around in the sauce to get it coated before adding the broth - I just went right to the broth while I had the measuring cup in my hand from the wine. I didn't notice this until I went back to see if your broth was as red as mine.
  • I cooked the potatoes for 45 minutes, and they weren't fully cooked through yet. I was thinking I need to cook them longer next time, my wife said it would be a better idea to just cut them smaller next time.

So, pretty good, but not great given a few things I did wrong. At least I know what to fix the next time I make this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (4 children)

OK, so I was adding ingredients to my grocery list to try and make this this weekend, and:

add the tomato paste. Cook and stir this for 3-5 minutes. then

You have tomato paste mentioned here. I clearly see you add it in the GIF. It is not in the ingredient list. How much should I add?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't know if I'll make this, but I'm so glad someone is posting to this community. Please keep it up!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I don't know how many people take the Tram in the middle of the winter, especially since the ski area hasn't opened the past few years. But it won't be open if you try. Hopefully the promised "quicker trips during busy periods" will materialize.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Meh, that was the auto-suggest title

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Are you calling for a ban on human driven cars? They killed more than zero people yesterday! If you aren't, you've accepted a human-driven vehicular homicide rate above zero.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

I mean, that sucks, but it's not like things are going to get better once you're outside of the conditions mentioned

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the plan! But it's still nice to know if these are the find I thought they were even if I don't plan on reselling them any time in the near future.

 

Smaller one is a Griswold No. 8, marked 704H.

Larger one is a Wagner Ware 11 ^3^/~4~ Inch Skillet, with a "10" on the handle.

I managed to get them for $50 total. I can't find exact matches online, but I think this is a good deal for these two. Is it?

 

They charged him with possession

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

OK, so I looked though my browser history, and here are some relevant pages I found:

I don't remember how much I used each one, but eventually I pieced together enough information information to get the Browserpass extension working in the Google Chrome flatpak. But three of those links are KeePassXC, which should be useful for adapting this for your use.

The main file that was having problems was the Browserpass Native Messaging Hosts file in my config directory for the Chrome flatpak, ~/.var/app/com.google.Chrome/config/google-chrome/NativeMessagingHosts/com.github.browserpass.native.json. Originally it was a symlink to a file at /usr/lib/browserpass/hosts/chromium/com.github.browserpass.native.json:

{
    "name": "com.github.browserpass.native",
    "description": "Browserpass native component for the Chromium extension",
    "path": "/usr/bin/browserpass-linux64",
    "type": "stdio",
    "allowed_origins": [
        "chrome-extension://naepdomgkenhinolocfifgehidddafch/"
    ]
}

The call to /usr/bin/browserpass-linux64 did not see to work for me, so I ended up making a copy of the file in the NativeMessagingHosts directory and modified it to point to a script in my home mount:

wile_e8 NativeMessagingHosts $ diff com.github.browserpass.native.json.orig com.github.browserpass.native.json
4c4
<     "path": "/usr/bin/browserpass-linux64",
***
>     "path": "/home/wile_e8/.config/browserpass/browserpass.sh",

I don't remember why I picked to do it inside the ~/.config directory, but it worked so I left it. And here is the script I put at ~/.config/browerpass/browserpass.sh:

#!/bin/sh
cd ~
/usr/bin/flatpak-spawn --host /usr/bin/browserpass-linux64 2>/tmp/error.log

I don't remember how I came up with that script, it must be somewhere in the four links at the top.

Finally, I needed to use Flatseal to allow access to the script. In the Google Chrome settings, under "Filesystem->Other files", I added an entry saying ~/.config/browserpass:ro. Also modified from the default in Flatseal, I have "Filesystem->All user files" enabled, along with "Socket->D-Bus session bus" and "Socket->D-Bus system bus". I don't know how necessary the last three are, but I'm not messing with it now that I have it working.

So, that's what I did to get the Browserpass extension working in the Google Chrome flatpak. You'll have to modify some things to get it working for KeePassXC, or for Firefox. But that general pattern should work.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Keep an eye out, I'll come back to this. It involves posting config file diffs and a script I wrote, it'll be a longer post I don't have the time to write right at this moment.

But yes, the fact that I need to find the time to post all the changes I needed to make to get this to work is part of the problem here.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

FWIW I figured out how to get a password manager (Browserpass, not KeePassXC) to communicate with flatpak Chrome if you want some advice on how to get it to work.

But yes, it was way more difficult than it should have been (which is "should work out of the box, just like a regular package"). So if you're just listing some of the shortcomings of flatpak, never mind.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's kind of amazing it took this long - I don't know why they didn't do it this way from the start.

view more: next ›