50
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
27
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
72
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
55
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
26
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
44
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
37
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
27
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
46
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
20
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
49
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
52
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 31 points 7 months ago

fTPM has a bug, don't know if it's fixed

https://www.techspot.com/news/93684-amd-promises-fix-ftpm-issue-causes-stuttering-freezes.html

Veracrypt also doesn't recommend using encryption that relies on TPMs

Some encryption programs use TPM to prevent attacks. Will VeraCrypt use it too? No. Those programs use TPM to protect against attacks that require the attacker to have administrator privileges, or physical access to the computer, and the attacker needs you to use the computer after such an access. However, if any of these conditions is met, it is actually impossible to secure the computer (see below) and, therefore, you must stop using it (instead of relying on TPM).

If the attacker has administrator privileges, he can, for example, reset the TPM, capture the content of RAM (containing master keys) or content of files stored on mounted VeraCrypt volumes (decrypted on the fly), which can then be sent to the attacker over the Internet or saved to an unencrypted local drive (from which the attacker might be able to read it later, when he gains physical access to the computer).

https://veracrypt.eu/en/FAQ.html

Let's assume the attackers were law enforcers

[-] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago

Just like his father

[-] [email protected] 31 points 7 months ago

Watchout this asswipe kakao corp trying to sue Mangadex

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/12307706

[-] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Thanks, still no luck.

I guess batoto has made changes

EDIT :

I also found this on another unoffical repo

[-] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago
  • Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind
  • My Neighbor Totoro
  • Big Trouble in Little China
[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

Have you tried PhotoGIMP ?

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

Google Chrome? Privacy?

[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Illegal immigration is another problem, but blaming wildfires on them without strong evidence and hunting them down is wrong

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Yeah, on their cloud. LoL

[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

It's far less dangerous than using Threads

As long as they don't ask for your phone number, ID and you don't expose yourself. You'll be fine.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

https://infosec.pub/post/400702

and..

YSK : Meta is a threat to the privacy of fediverse users, if there are fediverse instances that remain federated with Meta.

Ross Schulman, senior fellow for decentralization at digital rights nonprofit the Electronic Frontier Foundation, notes that if Threads emerges as a massive player in the fediverse, there could be concerns about what he calls “social graph slurping." Meta will know who all of its users interact with and follow within Threads, and it will also be able to see who its users follow in the broader fediverse. And if Threads builds up anywhere near the reach of other Meta platforms, just this little slice of life would give the company a fairly expansive view of interactions beyond its borders.

https://www.wired.com/story/meta-threads-privacy-decentralization/

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Yup they can mess up the fediverse in the near future

https://fabulous.systems/posts/2023/06/meta-is-a-danger-to-the-fediverse/

https://fediversereport.com/meta-plans-on-joining-the-fediverse-the-responses/

And there's Google's with their new privacy policy states that it can use publicly available data to help train its AI models

https://www.engadget.com/googles-updated-privacy-policy-states-it-can-use-public-data-to-train-its-ai-models-095541684.html

They only cares about money and unlimited growth.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

throws_lemy

joined 1 year ago