sudo

Forgive me if this sounds condescending but you're not providing any specifics so I don't know if you're making any rudimentary mistakes like trying to use your home WAN IP address instead of a tailscale IP address. If your nginix proxy manager is port forward on your home router and jellyfin isn't then you'd get the results you described if you're using your home WAN IP address.

You shouldn't be using IP addresses directly if you have them all on the same tailnet. Tailscale will set up MagicDNS which will make them all addressible by their host names. You can use the IP address of a machine on the tailnet, but you must use the IP address that tailscale assigns the host, which is visible from tailscale status. The IP addresses should all start with 10.

Please confirm that your remote host is listed in the output of tailscale status from the home server and visa-versa from the remote server. Please also confirm that you're using the hostnames or IP addresses listed in the output. If all is confirmed, try executing nmap -sT from the remote server against the home server. You should see port 8096 for jellyfin listed.

MagicDNS is known to break by getting into fights over /etc/resolv.conf with other services, but its easy to fix.

Is the remote host simply not able to join your local tailnet or is the issue specifically with accessing the services on the local hosts?

Are you seeing any errors in your tailscaled logs?

ansible-playbook even if its just one target host. Services might get hosted as systemd or docker, or a raw binary, whatever's appropriate. The absible docker module is extremely similar to docker-compose. It only gets messy if you have a complicated system of networks and dependencies.

You continue to not cite anything but your own baseless speculation and now you're blatantly misquoting me in bad faith.

• That might be illegal because it was confidential.
• That wouldn’t violate any laws, even if it did effect negotiations

Fuck off.

7/10 Photoshop job. There aren't distortion lines but it is noticeably blurrier where its been edited.

I don't object to photoshopping billionaires. Im only asking for a sharper job.

Jayapal said one plan is to propose a raft of executive orders President Biden could issue to "protect existing structures," such as shielding career civil servants and Justice Department officials.

Yes! Good!

Some Democrats are also sensitive to the perception that they are adopting the tactics of Republican state legislators who used their supermajorities to kneecap incoming Democratic governors.

Fucking gauge my eyeballs out. You can't call them fascists and then object to playing dirty against them.

"We're trying to show how the United States is supposed to conduct itself every four years when a new person takes over the reins of government," said Cleaver.

McConnell denied Obama a Supreme court appointment! The precedent is already set! Your norms are already broken!

If democrats want to win they must purge their own ranks of members like Cleaver and rebuild with more Jayapals or else they will keep ceding grounds to fascists.

Because your explanation didn't demonstrate why that matters. Any candidate's position can jeopardize ongoing negotiations if its contrary to the current admin.

The VP is very much at liberty to sabotage the current admin. There's illegal ways to do it sure. Like if Harris said "Bibi openly admitted on a confidential line that he's doing genocide." That might be illegal because it was confidential. But she could say "I think Bibi is doing genocide. Biden doesn't, but I think he's wrong". That wouldn't violate any laws, even if it did effect negotiations. Remember the VP is an elected position, not a cabinet member. The president can't fire them.

If you're just speculating then its baseless speculation. You might be right, but you'll have to point to an actual law to prove your point.

By that logic any presidential candidate would be banned from disagreeing with the president on active foreign policy issues which is absolutely not true. There's no legal reason why the VP can't disagree with the president.

Are you suggesting that its illegal for the VP to publicly disagree with the President?

I don't know why anyone thought Harris would change course on Israel beyond mere wishful thinking. She made it abundantly clear numerous times that she was going to stay the course.

Majority of white women voted Trump

Latino men how dare you!!!

So in your mind no one can criticize the DNC's failure to stop fascism or its concessions to said fascist movemet? Our glorious leadership must be blindly followed no matter how many times they fail or give ground to fascists?