shukufuku

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the bathroom is down the narrow stairs, turn around, teleport... fine I'll show you.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Running of the bulls, but with goats. They trample wherever they please

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Yes, they just appear. Every day another painting of you dead in the woods.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

"I don't care about anyone's opinions" - poster on a community to share opinions

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm disappointed that there's not E089 PROGRAMMER IS NOT BEING SINCERE

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That money is still going somewhere. The donors are getting poorer and whoever is receiving the legal fees is getting more powerful.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

At that price point he's allowed to hit

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, you have your digital id in a database that also has a link to a picture of the precious. There is no implied ownership of the image.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You got any of them Mummies Alive! movies?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So are the institutions that are breached only criminally or civilly liable if the hackers leak protected data? Otherwise, why would they pay the ransom. It seems like they should have some liability because they didn't safeguard their data properly. I suppose they could be attempting to save their clients' trust even without a monetary penalty. If the hackers leak the data after being paid, does that matter legally? Does the amount paid or demanded affect how much of a penalty is applied?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

XD lol random

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Arizona is our "floor is lava" theme park

view more: ‹ prev next ›