relevants

Ooh good catch. That makes sense. Not sure I would call this beautiful, especially without any way to tell how much time has passed, but fair enough

That doesn't make sense unless this was personal expenditure, which it doesn't seem to be

But.. from when? Surely expenditure hasn't gone up linearly with time

..how did the line come about? How did they determine what the life expectancy would have been with less expenditure per capita?

Man kann ja auch mit was anderem als dem Auto zu Besuch kommen.

Wenn es um etwas geht, mit dem die Liberalen sich identifizieren können: "Anreize schaffen!"

Wenn es um soziale Grundbedürfnisse geht: "Angebot und Nachfrage regeln den Preis!"

Inheritance is random

My favorite way to resolve method ambiguities.

Somehow Corrections gave a late night show parasocial vibes and I am here for it

Ah right, and here I thought the point of the protest was calling for peace. Silly me!

For me it was the fact that the first sentence literally just spells out what the line above says. It feels like every other sentence coming from ChatGPT is just a summary of the previous sentence. (Unless it's trying to relativize, then it hits you with the "it's important to remember".)

Eh, I mean it's a very specific flavor of overexplaining and needlessly summarizing, I don't think real ramblings (for lack of a better word) would exhibit this particular writing style purely by chance, even with repeated points.

This consistent overexplaining of every single sentence reeks of GPT