this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
392 points (97.8% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

6874 readers
3 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (5 children)

..how did the line come about? How did they determine what the life expectancy would have been with less expenditure per capita?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago

My guess is that this was a gif at some point and the line is historical data

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

At least one of those lines goes back on itself at some point, so my assumption is that it's tracking where each country has been over time.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Ooh good catch. That makes sense. Not sure I would call this beautiful, especially without any way to tell how much time has passed, but fair enough

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think the line might be historical data?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But.. from when? Surely expenditure hasn't gone up linearly with time

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yeah something is weird about this graph.

Health expense in what timeframe? Monthly, yearly?

If i had to guess, i would say this graph just shows the average yearly health expense of people that died at age X

So people that spend more money on their health, live longer. If thats the whole message this is the most boring graph ever.

If the US line is true, it shows that people there get much less value out of the money they spend on their health.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

My guess is that the line tracks what the life expectancy was when the expenditure per capita was that much? Might have to dig into their source to get more details.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There is a minimum amount which is likely the least some people spent on their health. So there is no interpolation I can see.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

That doesn't make sense unless this was personal expenditure, which it doesn't seem to be