That's interesting -- you're saying the state regulator runs exams to get your licence? I wonder what sort of things these exams assess?
In Australia, for a teaching degree to be recognised by the regulator, the university needs to get their programme accredited by the regulator, where they demonstrate that their programme meets certain professional teaching standards. One condition is that teaching candidates need to sit and pass a national numeracy and literacy online test run by an independent third party. This seems a bit strange, as there is no way that someone should be be able to even qualify for a degree at a Masters level without having basic literacy and numeracy skills.
Glad to hear you are enjoying it. There is more to teaching than most people realise, so there is indeed a lot to learn.
I can only speak for the ITE programme I did, but I found that there was a big focus on how to research into issues and work out solutions for yourself -- very much a "give them a fish, feed them for a day; teach them to fish, teach them for a lifetime" philosophy. After all, teaching is a complex environment that requires creative problem-solving, and what works in one context may not work well in another. So really, an ITE programme is going to be about giving new teachers a good theoretical foundation on which to build, and it is on-the-job where they will hone their teaching practice. Do our ITE programmes need to be overhauled? I think the one I personally attended was very good, but it seems others may have had a less positive experience.