njtrafficsignshopper

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

How did that go?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Do you plan on cooking in space?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Homestar runner

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Your username is a hell of a reference, haha

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think what it means is that it doesn't add up all the little arrows across all posts and comments, by default. Although, I suppose an instance, external tool, or browser plugin could still do that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Magazines? I apparently missed something so far.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There would not be a need to duplicate or sync all user databases across the fediverse to support SSO. In fact SSO already exists in other contexts and I haven't heard of any implementation that works that way. It's essentially accomplished by the authority and the service exchanging login tokens.

 

Some more spitballing from a noob here, but I wonder if much thought has been given to account portability between Lemmy instances, or even Fediverse apps in general.

So far, from what I can see, accounts are pretty much siloed. Two opportunities off the top of my head:

  • Export your account, including all posts, comments, and user metadata and customization. This actually might be legally required by some jurisdictions, although I'm no lawyer. GDPR might not be applicable for one reason or another but I think the spirit of the law is good.

  • Single sign on. This is perhaps a little harder to implement, but it might be nice to be able to participate on another fediverse app without having to research instances and sign up. Also nice to try out different instances of the same app before committing to one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That seems to me to be one of the big issues - it looks like the available themes are down to the discretion of the instance admin. I dunno if allowing an arbitrary URL for a theme would be too much of a security hole, but it seems like that would quickly make each user able to use any theme they want.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What kind of help you need? I'm down to look at it at least!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I will defederate with anyone who dares associate with Kevin Bacon

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Personally, I am fresh enough to all this that I feel it's prudent to kind of sit back on the discussion, and am leaning toward the "defederate" option.

However - I deleted my Facebook years ago, and never had Instagram or Twitter. It would be nice to interact with my own family and friends who do most of their online presence in places like that. So I kinda get it. I'm not after the mass-produced content but it would be cool to hear from people I know again that I've lost touch with because I'm stubborn about FB.

Just spitballing - and please consider that I haven't been at Lemmy long enough to know if this is a terrible idea - but what about an instance that hasn't blocked Facebook and other big corpos, but doesn't raise their content by default? Like what if you have to actively connect with people on them? Seems like a decent middle ground, until Facebook decides to break it anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I might be willing to help with this if you want to tackle it and are interested in help. I'm newish to Lemmy but want to get my feet wet. What tech stack do you prefer? Typescript is a very short leap from Javascript if you already know it, IMO.

 

I was just thinking I'd like to make some UI tweaks - I like dark themes but the dark theme is a little hard to parse for me here.

Of course it's always possible to go the user stylesheets route, with something like Tampermonkey or Stylish. But, is there an established best practice already? Do most instances have the same UI, and, if not, how are the differences implemented?

I also think there's probably room for some more niche stuff like RES used to do, but considering Lemmy is open source it might make sense to do some of that against the official repo rather than as another layer on top. Then again that would make adoption less convenient and under user control.

view more: next ›