leftofthat

joined 4 years ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Is building a giant guillotine too on the nose?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

I've not used it, but Godot looks fun and approachable and iirc it's open source

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Twister: Infinity Storm

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

To be clear you don't need to have money invested/growing in order to retire. You just need money. Putting $50 in a jar is still $50 you'll have in retirement to spend on something. Nothing unethical about that.

But to counter inflation and sometimes just for the sake of wanting more, you can take an additional step of investing your money so that it makes more money. That passive income needs to come from somewhere.

If you invest in stocks, it's coming from the company's exploitation of its workers to generate profits (in addition to other rent seeking behavior; many companies own sizable real estate investments).

If you invest in real estate, it's coming from rents.

If you invest in funds, it probably owns stocks or real estate.

What you're really asking for is a way to generate passive income without exploiting anyone. But this is a solved problem. The answer is a government entitlement program that folks can pay into (i.e. Social Security). It's just been gutted by Congress. Did they remove the only general ethical option for investing for retirement? Maybe.

This isn't to say there aren't places where each of us feel we could put our money and have it grow without feeling part of something unethical. Maybe a local business could use an investment and be happy to pay back interest. Some folks are morally opposed to government bonds but I think they're fine as an option.

And thinking of investments outside of the box a bit can help too. Spending money today to upgrade or buy better things can itself have a future return on investment and be equally good of an investment strategy than putting money in a savings account.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They usually say that too eventually. Have a good one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Damn those are some bleak options, yeah. Almost like the US is a capitalist hellscape or something.

"Join us or perish" is what they seem to be signaling, yeah.

Apparently you see that as only having two choices and are going with "join them," which is fine I'm not your morality coach. I'm certainly not asking you to sit down and die.

You can rationalize it all you want. That you have no choice but to participate. I hear it all the time from people telling me to vote for Biden.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I addressed pensions in my initial comment.

Most pension funds have a similar issue in that they are investing in rent seeking etc. But unlike 401ks, pensions carry with them significant political power than can influence where the money is going. This is (imo) why they are being gutted in favor of individual 401k accounts.

Unions and pensions can be powerful tools. They're being replaced by Independent Contractors and 401ks.

If a pension fund looks identical to a 401k index fund then yeah I'd have the same opinion.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Just to clarify: a 401k is just a savings account that is tax deferred. By itself that doesn't make any money or interest. Most people then take that money and have it invested. That's what I'm commenting on.

The return in a 401k is from (typically) a managed fund or an index fund. It's a good return, as you note. That's because it's largely from rent extraction.

It's a great deal if you are ok with functionally owning a small apartment in some other state where a family pays half their paycheck so that you get your 5% return on investment. But know that is what is happening.

The whole "I have no other choice" position is past any point I'm trying to make. I don't know anyone's specific situation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children)

I said above:

There's no functional difference to buying a $200,000 apartment and renting it out as a landlord or putting $200,000 in a 401k managed retirement fund that owns several hundred apartments buildings. And they do.

We can disagree there, then. There's a much cleaner and direct connection between a fund and rent extraction than there is between a savings bond and a bomb. That's exactly my point. These details matter.

You can lump it all together if you want. I see more nuance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (10 children)

There's a moral difference in owning a savings bond and being a landlord. Sorry if you don't want to engage with that and think it's all a wash because nothing is ethical under capitalism.

view more: ‹ prev next ›