jerdle_lemmy

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean yeah, he is, but saying it's new isn't why he's talking bollocks. There was an Antifa that the modern antifa claims ideological descent from, and that is what he is claiming supported Hitler.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It's because there's something cult-like about many Democrats as much as many Republicans. And yes, I do mean as much as as in equal amounts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Antifa isn't all that new though. While the American antifa isn't actually a branch of the original 1930s German one, it likes to think it is, and it's the German one that Scott's claiming helped Hitler gain power.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's true if it's closer to 2095. If it's closer to 2025, there's fuck all we can do to stop it, and so we need to do what's best to survive it, which is not the same as what's best to prevent it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

No. No it wasn't. Antifaschistische Aktion was a paramilitary wing of the communists, fighting both the social democratic Iron Front and the Nazi Sturmabteilung.

The only way in which it could be said to be allied with the Nazis is that both of them opposed the social democrats, but the enemy of your enemy is not in fact your friend. The KPD saw both the SPD and the NSDAP as fascists, rather than in any way allying with the NSDAP against the SPD.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's kind of important whether it's 2095 (prepare for it, set up nuclear, reduce carbon emissions) or 2025 (fuck global warming, we need fuel and we need it now, the more carbon emitted the better).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It doesn't to me. It's just communists vs liberals rather than left vs right.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

As someone with similar views, I recently realised that I have the exact same tribalism and aggression, it's just targeted at people who have that mentality.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Blame/credit (blame in this case) doesn't travel that way.

Take the following example: Alice and Bob both support view X. Bob also supports view Y. Y is evil. Then, Bob can be deemed responsible for supporting view Y. But X does not become evil because Bob is. And so Alice is completely fine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Hell, "gaslighting" itself is a good example of this phenomenon, and it's mostly on the left.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah, it's probably because most of us left Reddit at some point, either due to banning left-wing subs or due to corporate dickery.

The right-wingers went their way, to places like Voat, Saidit, Gab and Truth Social.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you want to link me to an author I don't recognise, you'll have to try harder than Luxemburg!

12
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I'm aware that many Soapbox instances are somewhat controversial. Is this to the extent that any Soapbox instance would have the same reputation?

view more: next ›