charonn0

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (10 children)

Except what they ask for is beyond the power of the courts to grant.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (12 children)

It's enforceable by Congress through their oversight and impeachment powers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You know Billy, what worries me is how your mother is going to take this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (14 children)

I don't think that works. You'd still have a situation where the plaintiffs are asking the court to decide US foreign and defense policy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (17 children)

Which US laws are you talking about?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (19 children)

I'm referring to the lawsuit itself. It may be "very real", but it's also complete nonsense.

US courts don't rule on political questions, nor do they decide US foreign policy, nor do they provide advisory opinions. This lawsuit fails to state a cognizable claim and seeks relief that is beyond the power of the judiciary to grant.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Even in 2016 it was obvious what kind of person he was. His "good" supporters claimed that being President would change him for the better. We all knew then that they were wrong. We all know now that they were lying.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, let's see, the lawsuit was filed in the United States, in a US court, and under US laws.

So, obviously, I'm talking about Outer Mongolia.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Have you actually read this lawsuit? It asks for things that US courts simply cannot do.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (24 children)

That's not how the courts work here.

view more: ‹ prev next ›