It means “it was popular and/or successful but not my idea so it’s bad”.
athairmor
It’s got something way better: LieAr
This one too plausible for satire.
He brought the Bible into it so I’m betting it was a misteress.
I’m betting this is where the suspicious PA voter registrations are from.
Could be bias. But, I wonder if it could be because English has borrowed so much from other languages.
It’s also interesting that English and French look so similar in the graphs. Both, have been the de facto international language for a long time.
The vaccines have been tested, reviewed and used in a majority of the population and reviewed more. All the data is there. How much more do you need?
Where is any data at all showing them to be ineffective or dangerous? Where?
Do you really think government agencies are faking and hiding data so that people can be injected with vaccines that don’t work? If so, why? What evidence is there for this? What motivation could you even speculate on?
No one is claiming scientists are perfect. The reason we know there’s some bad science out there is because the process works.
You don’t get to claim scientists are lying without showing some fucking evidence.
No, you see, they’re hiding stuff. The data that’s out there doesn’t support his hallucinations so, obviously, the real data is being hidden. ^/s^
Nov 6 - Jan 21 is going to be tense. But, if Harris wins it’ll be worth it.
We should definitely listen to tech bros with no military experience on matters of defense. Uh huh. I’m sure their ideas won’t be either self-serving money grabs or middle-school boy fantasies.
I hope all those farmers are paying attention to who won them the right to repair their tractors.