Where I'm at, when the Europeans came, they decimated our population, put those who survived either on chains or at their service, robed all the gold and silver, taught us for centuries to hate ourselves over being brown, and imposed their beauty and cultural standards as superior, and when we finally thought we kicked them out, they remained the owners of everything via capitalism and imperialism. So I really wouldn't know about this "multicultural Europe" of yours.
argumento
joined 3 years ago
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] Kirilov just blocked me, LMAO.
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
I don't want a link bro. Don't be a coward, defend your point with your own words. I dare you.
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
Why don't you illuminate us with an explanation of how a fallacy of authority fits the statement "I know Rashid Khalidi has good academic credentials as an historian, I expect his work to be rigorous". I'd be delighted to read your explanation.
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
I don't want to converse about logical fallacies. I'm more interested in debating the correctness of Khalidi's title, which was the topic a few posts back, when you jumped in.
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
-
Argumentum ad populum and fallacy of authority are not the same, you pompous prick.
-
You are making general opinions on a book you haven't read, based only in your inability to grasp the title.
3.You wouldn't call a book titled "History of World War 2" biased. Why do you call a book that tells the story of the 100 years resistance to colonialism in Palestine biased? It was a war, by any definition
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] When a description of reality sounds biased to you, the easiest explanation, and the most correct one, is that it's your own bias the one that keeps you from engaging with reality.
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
That you claim there's no genocidal intent on Israel actions is groundless. There's ample evidence on the subject, from Netanyahu's Amalek references, to IDF soldiers chanting "there are no uninvolved civilians".
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
Your comment is appalling. People are not fungible tokens, 25 thousand births will not make 25 thousand murders Ok.
The demographic growth doesn't annul the fact that Palestinians where expelled from 78% of their country, nor the fact that there's ample reason to claim it's genocide from public statements alone.
Cutting water and electricity are also genocidal acts.
Denying the entry of humanitarian aid trucks is also a genocidal act.
view more: next ›
@[email protected] I think antisemitism is largely an European problem, and that Zionism and antisemitism go hand in hand. Get rid of European antisemitism, you get rid of the raison d'etre of Zionism.