ano_ba_to

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Being safer than humans is a decent starting point, but safety should be maximized to the best of a machine's capability, even if it means adding a sensor or two. Keeping screws loose on a Boeing airplane still makes the plane safer than driving, so Boeing should not be made to take responsibility.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

That's a low bar when you consider how stringent airline safety is in comparison, and that kills way less people than driving does. If sensors can save people's lives, then knowingly not including them for profit is intentionally malicious.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

The tourbillon watches are very rare too. Don't miss out!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

On the contrary, this is actually the strategy to win the swing voters. Some of them just need to be haters and they win bigly.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"I'll bet you wouldn't say that joke about Muslims or Jews". The joke they actually have in mind:

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Air travel is generally safer than driving too, but every accident is studied thoroughly. Self-driving is fine, but anyone trying to implement it should be held to a high standard. Boeing slacked off and they're facing some backlash.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

"10 times safer than human drivers", (except during specific visually difficult conditions which we knowingly can prevent but won't because it's 10 times safer than human drivers). In software, if we have replicable conditions that cause the program to fail, we fix those, even though the bug probably won't kill anyone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I was hoping after the graphical upgrade with Morrowind that they'd bring back interesting mechanics from Daggerfall, but they went the complete opposite direction for the money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I'm glad some of them chose not to be enablers after Starfield.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Don't get me wrong, nuclear energy is good. It's just being used to power AI. That's a waste. It's being used so a corporation can profit, not to power homes. It's being used to potentially replace humans, who need less power to function and whose power consumption cannot already be avoided anyway.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

In my daily experience, the voice becomes choppy when a screen is being shared. It's the worst out of what I've used in the past.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The alternative I was talking about are called employee brains.

view more: next ›