Comrade, I work at Langley and I still think China owns.
Communists reject this: we have a coherent framework of looking at the world, our position on individual struggles (labor, racism, queer liberation, colonialism, whatever) is informed by that, and so we can have strong beliefs about many issues that are a reflection of our strong central beliefs.
Communism will always be 2 things 1) informed by a coherent framework and 2) cool. It's really neat because of that. You get a lot of dunks because the zeitgeist will necessarily always determined by a lot of people poking at the lowest common denominator and your understanding of theory gives you succinct explanations. I.e. someone talking about the risks a business owner takes and you responding how they risk ending up working alongside your dumbass. It's also always cool to be a misfit and care for other misfits. The Yemeni pirate kid who took over that shipping vessel is hard not to root for if you're not reveling in your direct benefit from the imperialist economy. A union is going to always have your heart more than shareholders will. You can try to point fingers at a teacher's union and claim that they're greedy, but how could you ever get a cultural purchase about teachers being overpaid? It's just not going to happen.
It's so neat that communists disdain to conceal their aims.
I propose we all follow me in continuing to not care about darts. It sounds like 50% of competitive darts players were included in the story so far. Fallon, van Leuven, and the other 2 darts players should go have a beer. They can care about darts and the rest of us will simply watch some other slop.
I like visual basic. It was really easy to learn for loops with
Me getting an 88 on an exam 
Our entire movement will be eepy!! 
Hold up, I read instead of being on my damn phone before bed last night and I thought I was doing good.
Our enemy is simultaneously woke (crash into the WTC) and unwoke (enemy of the LGBT)
I wish for the next generation to have communism so ingrained in their psyche that they can argue like dogshit in its defense and come out on top like a proud chauvinist.
"You sound like a capitalist. You may want to ride around in luxury vehicles, but that sort of desire causes people to eat cereal for dinner. You need to check that desire for personal enrichment before you start sending the CIA into South America, chud."
I'm gonna type it out for prosperity's sake. In my experience, "whatever it takes" might actively take away from your contentment and enjoyment of exercise and interacting with the world. I can't find the clip, which happens too often with Cbum, but the Mr. Olympia champion of the classical men's physique for many years in a row talks about how he had to take his own meal to parties or abstain from going out with friends while in prep for competition and how isolating it was. Therefore, if I'm not getting paid for it, I'm probably not forgoing a night with friends in exchange for a marginal gain in physique.
What I'm reading is that you like climbing but you're willing to forgo how you like to move and fuel your body in exchange for looking better. I had all sorts of accolades: 1/2/3/4, 1000lb club, 5pl8 diddly, and some oly lifting. I had a little vein on my obliques and bicep, and I even learned my middle right ab has a little wink at the end. I let it all slide away to do martial arts and I'm happier for it. Lifting and cutting for aesthetics over feeling good is a choice with some gravity to it.
Lifting while cutting maximizes the ratio of fat loss to muscle loss. It's a shitty process and some might argue not worth, but if you want abs and what you're doing isn't working, you likely need to lock in, count calories, and move heavy things
I teach one class at the BJJ gym. I said when I took the responsibility that I'd often have to be traveling and unavailable, they said fine and that it'd be easy to get substitutes. I love having to ask 12 people to get a substitute because I'm out of town.
Fix your shit game, Nintendo!