UltraGiGaGigantic

joined 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The elimination of the First Past the Post voting system would allow voters to support third-party candidates without the fear of causing a spoiler effect. This change would promote greater competition in elections, improving the caliber of candidates available to all voters. Also, it is likely to boost voter turnout and increase political engagement.

Electoral reform has already been achieved at the state level; Alaska and Maine have successfully implemented changes to their electoral systems, demonstrating that broader reform is feasible.

However, Republicans have taken steps to preserve the First Past the Post voting system. For instance, Florida recently outlawed Ranked Choice voting. Despite this setback, there are numerous alternatives to First Past the Post, ensuring that bans like Florida’s do not obstruct progress toward electoral reform.

This raises the question: why do predominantly Democratic states continue to utilize First Past the Post voting? Why continueto use a voting system favored by Republicans? In states controlled by Democrats, there are no Republican obstacles preventing these reforms.

It is evident that Democrats recognize the shortcomings of First Past the Post voting. Mentioning third-party voting on social media often prompts numerous Democrats to caution against “wasting” votes that could inadvertently benefit Republicans. It is perplexing to acknowledge flaws in the voting system yet fail to take action to address them. Lecturing others about the drawbacks of First Past the Post voting while neglecting to pursue solutions is contradictory and counterproductive.

Here are some videos on the topic if you’d like to know more:

First Past The Post voting

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo

Other electoral systems to choose from:

Alternative vote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Y3jE3B8HsE

Ranked Choice voting

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Z2fRPRkWvY

Range Voting

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3GFG0sXIig

Single Transferable Vote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8XOZJkozfI

STAR voting

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-mOeUXAkV0

Mixed Member Proportional representation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QT0I-sdoSXU

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I see your post is missing the required 20,000 word essay in how the Republicans are worse then democrats... thus you are a secret Russian Republican antisemite!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

I was broke as hell and the vasectomy was going to cost $700.

I finally saved $700, and when I went in they said "shit dawg, you're broke as hell. Here is this program to make it free"

So even if you can't afford it, try reaching out to your local planned parenthood. They know how to navigate the benefit system better then you.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago

The 1% can make their own wage slaves.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Crusty jugglers

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps the record was corrected after you left.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The answer is you want to build a train route through a mountain. You don't need it, thus we don't have to build it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I was under the impression that the nation state should be dissolved and everyone forms communes that reflect their values.

Direct democracy can work way better with smaller communities.

The problem is, you would need a large federation of these communes to band together to defeat a hostile nation state level threat.

The federation! Oh shit

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Have you ever seen Adam Curtis's "Century of the Self"? Super long, but it goes on about how marketing and politics intertwined.

I think it's on YouTube for free

view more: ‹ prev next ›