TomboyShulk

Reporter: @[email protected]

Reason: what the actual fuck is wrong with this person?

cry more reactionaries

I simply violate the law

lmao this user got banned from this community on dbzer0's end, get fucked

Anonymous hate researcher that has worked with top academic researchers worldwide on combating hate on social media! Here to document hesitant and bad faith nazi instances!

quick question: are you Richard Lee Rogers of Youngstown State University. please tell me you are. it would be so funny

People always say to me, they always say: 'Ms. TomboyShulk, aren't you a little harsh with these pre-emptive purges?' Folks, as you can–and you can see it quite clearly–quite clearly see with this rambunctious little imp, I'm just as harsh as I need to be; could stand to be a bit harsher, frankly.

16 and 30, whilst barely scraping the line of legality (depending on your location, at that), is colloquially understood to be pedophilia. I don't see why an accusation that details lines such as:

She alleges he referred to her as "the child" during an emotionally abusive and controlling relationship

shouldn't have a CW for pedophilia, as even if it's not technically breaking the law, it is clear that there is an alleged power imbalance that is identical to one of a pedophilic relationship. Does that seem sound?

edit: lmao never mind, to the gulag with you

thanks in advance

I didn't notice they ended it like that, holy shit. The absolute entitlement of liberals

@[email protected] care to explain your reasoning why this is 'needlessly clickbait'? it's quite literally the article headline with a content warning.