Smoolak

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This will make that device so much more usable.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

On the contrary AUR seems to have a lot more binary packages than source packages in my experience. Tons of package also have a "-bin" version (e.g. yay).

Your "unsupported" comment is a bit weird. It's the AUR user community that supports Arch and makes AUR compatible with it. I don't know why somebody would contemplate the other way around. I mean, it's the while philosophy of the AUR.

I've been using it for the past 12 years and I rarely got any issues with it. I think you fear mongering quite a bit. Sure, you get over some abandoned packages from time to time and once in a blue moon you get a dependency that doesn't install properly. When that happen you post a comment on the AUR or flag the package and it's solved in a matter of days most of the time. It's surprising that such a system would work so well, but it does.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (9 children)

Most people I know just use Arch Linux and the AUR. It seems to be the easiest system around for maximal package support and it's well maintained.