P1r4nha

Yep, variables that are merely declared are not initialized, so their value is not guaranteed. Could be anything.

You're charging the class for a thought crime!!

Horrible code. First, it doesn't compile because there's no ; at the end of the class definition.

And then more importantly you have a private destructor which means this CriminalScum's destructor will never be called, so you can't charge it with distruction either. Or are you telling me this CriminalScum has friends?

Selbst dann hab ich das Gefühl, dass die Vorstellungen, welche Massnahmen getroffen werden müssen, weit auseinander gehen und sich deshalb kein Konsens bildet.

Eine Studie, an die ich mich erinnern kann, ist zwar schon älter, aber sie hat gezeigt, dass populäre Massnahmen wie das Verbieten von Plastiktüten viel unwirksamer sind als die unpopulären. Ich hoffe unterdessen ist die Menschheit etwas besser informiert, aber sicher bin ich mir da leider nicht.

Man sieht das auch an Gesetzesinitiativen wo sich keine Mehrheiten bilden unter der Bevölkerung. Die sind zwar selten perfekt, doch ob wirklich Bereitschaft für wirksamen Klimaschutz da ist, mag ich bezweifeln.

Biden really doesn't want these Muslim votes it seems.

And even "white" is a very vague term. My GF from Latin America is blonde and if it weren't for her brown eyes, she could easily pass as a local in Europe. In fact she does pass as a local often enough. Plenty of people in Latin America are perfectly "white", so immigrants from Latin American countries to the US can assimilate within a generation, easily. I know plenty of "white" Americans speaking perfectly fine American English, but with a last name like Garcia. So yeah, it's ridiculous to die on the hill of "non-white" immigration from the south.

In fact, all of US wealth and power is built upon (involuntary/undocumented) immigration in different aspects, but pretty much every way. There's a reason why your electronics are cheap and your food is so affordable.

Not a bad take. I agree he's funnier in the constrained time, but I also liked the The Problem where he had more time for thoughtful discussions, interviews and debates. A lot less funny though.

Free from the shackles of AppleTV. It's nice to see him back in the seat where I learned about him the first time many many years ago.

The thing is: It's 30%, but leave it to the US to call themselves a democracy and completely defy the understanding of other democratic countries.

It's one thing to say that a country not spending even 2% of the GDP should not be able to call Article 5. It's another thing to say you would "encourage [Russia] to do whatever they wanted to do" with said country.

Nevertheless it's signaling unreliability, because it would violate the treaty the US has signed. Plenty of NATO countries have helped out the US when they called article 5 on bullshit arguments and lies when invading Afghanistan.

But you're right. It's good European countries rethink their dependence. Too bad it comes with rethinking their alliances as well, with a belligerent USA.

Trump's inviting the invasion. Let's not get things twisted. The US has plenty of ways to pressure other member states to contribute more spending to the alliance than threatening publicly to break the treaty and winking towards Russia.

The US demonstrates themselves as an unreliable partner. That's not in the interest of the US as they lose power globally, when countries rethink their dependence on them.

Congressional approval is necessary for entering treaties, not for leaving them. Congress tries to change that. Hopefully in time