Numberone

joined 1 year ago
[–] Numberone@startrek.website 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah maybe the problem is no one is describing what "work" means in this case. The goal is to reduce Chinese market share in the US EV market, protection of US industry ( lets be honest, probably the owners' income stream). I don't see that goal failing being likely.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 7 points 7 months ago (7 children)

See this makes sense to me. In good faith I don't understand how tariffs couldn't work. I mean, even if it doesn't STOP import of Chinese EV's, the uptake would be so much less than if they were 50% off....right?

History is rife with examples of countries developing their own industries by making imports more expensive.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 7 points 7 months ago

This is why we can't have nice things😂

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 12 points 7 months ago

I've had to repeatedly switcho "new teams". The selection isn't sticky for some reason. It seems like it shouldn't be that hard to develope a messaging app that does file transfers and meetings but apparently this bloated pile of horseshit proves reason wrong. A second long delay when changing threads? "You'll use it because corporate says you will...and you'll LOVE IT".

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

At least in the case of Gaza the US are literally funding it to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars. Unless there's some mystical magical procedure I'm not aware of, Biden could veto anything that supports Israel that comes out of Congress. A literal unused one person choke point that keeps passing weapons to Israel. The frustrating thing about Gaza is how simple it would be to stop it. Stop the flow of weapons. The US has threatened it before, and gotten results.

Please stop pretending the US can't wield power that isn't an invasion force.

Yeah, this article is also about funding...sooooo....

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 5 points 7 months ago

You do you, but I suspect you're on the wrong side of history. If not...we deserve what we'll get.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 1 points 7 months ago

Majority ru...oh, never mind

[–] Numberone@startrek.website -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Is linked to excess deaths? Technically it could be saving lives at a population scale. I doubt that's the case, but it could be. I'll read the article now and find out.

Edit: it doesn't seem to say anything regarding "normal" auto related deaths. They're focusing on the bullshit designation of an unfinished product as "autopilot",and a (small) subset of specific cases that are particularly aggregious, where there were 5-10 seconds of lead time into an incident. In these cases a person who was paying attention wouldn't have been in the accident.

Also some clarity edits.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 2 points 7 months ago

Takin' it back! ❤️

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 12 points 7 months ago

If it weren't true you would be experiencing a net acceleration due to the imbalance in the forces acting on you.

What's really interesting is figuring out WHY mechanistically it's true. I had to rethink the whole thing this morning, because it really is pretty nuts how much weaker gravity is than the electrostatic force.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Physics teacher: "The electrical force that repels the bottom of your foot from the surface of the earth is greater than the gravitational attraction between the entire earth and yourself".

Me: 😲

Edit: I guess it's more correct to say "equal to", rather than "greater" since you're static.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 3 points 8 months ago

"Damn, there's just not enough shopping centers", ain't it the truth.

view more: ‹ prev next ›