[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

@ajsadauskas @fuck_cars
Why is everyone so cynical here?
I am sure if we build just one more tunnel, everything will be fixed this time. 😜

[-] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

@mondoman712
We know how to fix this...
Increase Urban density around new suburban "nodes" Make those nodes walkable 15 minute citties. Link nodes to other nodes with mass transit and bike lanes.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

@simonvarwell @fuck_cars @ajsadauskas
Yeh. The 16% who voted no for a grocery store probably voted no for everything else, too.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

@Rediphile @CableMonster
Yes those too!
There is probably some scientific way to do this. Measure the impact on roads, society, other road users and the environment. and tax the vehicles with the worst impact more.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

@CableMonster
Thanks.
You can probably see where I am going with this.
There is a big difference between a smaller practice work truck and a giant monster truck.
The aim of any taxes should be to discourage certain trucks and encourage others.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

@CableMonster @anothercatgirl
Just out of curiosity, what sort of truck do you drive?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

@alcoholicorn @maegul
It's why I loved living right in the city, as a young man.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

@GarfieldYaoi @const_void
When buying a car, you have a wide choice of shitty corporations to purchase from.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

@azimir @NaibofTabr
Has anyone done a true cost analysis of cars?
All the external costs incling health, environment, climate change, Middle East Wars, Police...
#Urbanism #Traffication

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

@Salty @ajsadauskas @fuck_cars
We want them to stop drilling for more oil.
Throwing 1% of their profits on Lithium mining, while continuing to increase their emissions isn't really a win.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

@Overthr0w
Yes, he's deciding for other people who use the platform. It's called Moderation.
It means that users don't have to spend their time blocking stuff and can get on with enjoying the platform.
This is not the same as the government blocking everyone's access to something. Where nobody can see certain content. That may be a free speech issue. If you want to see car company's PR, then there are hundreds of other platforms you can go to.
This is free speech. The right to hear as well as not hear on a PRIVATE platform.

view more: next ›

MrLee

joined 2 years ago