That's a really good point
Er, I guess?? It's a convection device powered by butane (i.e. torch), so the physics are similar, I suppose. They are both good at small doses, too; but if possible the Vapman is even more analogue than the Vapcap: there is no click, and I've never successfully one-shotted a Vapman. It's more of a flavour-intense, sippin' style conduction vape, while the Dyna is more of a one-hitter. That might be my lack of technique talking, tho. I've nailed my various Vapcap combos, and with an FMJ I can truly get one-heat-cycle extraction; whereas the Vapman is a "heat... was that enough... couple seconds more... still a bit wispy... ah, there we go"
They're a great vape with an impeccable pedigree and a loyal following for good reason; imho criminally under-rated.
Check it out!
I miss the days of just having the rolling tray on the desk!
When I think that blazing just required flower, rizla, baccy and flame; the amount of kit I have now seems ludicrous, even if it provides the happy circumstance of indulging my love of gear/equipment.
Just as an FYI, as well: you can disable visibility of (self-proclaimed) bot accounts in your profile settings... But thanks for joining the community, and we look forward to creating fresh new content with you! Cheers, Loki
I haven't played around with it much, so this is a pretty uninformed suggestion, but BitWarden have a secrets manager, currently in beta. You can create projects, then grant human or service accounts access to secrets. Looks promising, but I have to say I'm a bit of a BW fanboy so I concede some bias.
Yep, just did a test report on your comment ;-) Thanks @[email protected] PS love your work
The use of captchas and email address requirements should cut down on the bot accounts at least slightly (the former more than the latter)
Well quite! Myself included. Plus it allows for the next tech, whatever that may be Virtual bongs with direct neuro-AR stimulation… or we
Hey @[email protected] do we need to redo, if already completed?
I mean, 'beyond combustion' could be taken as inclusive (Combustion, and Beyond!) But good point.
Yeah, if there's a reason I'm ambivalent about the bot, it's because you get the post title, but no context /comments...
ㄟ(ツ)ㄏ