this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
7 points (88.9% liked)

Vaporents

1 readers
1 users here now

Expats from Reddit's largest community focusing on cannabis flower vaporizers.

  1. Be chill, this is a cannabis forum after all.
  2. Post links, pics, vids talking about where your fav vape/bong/glass/pipe was from.
  3. Don’t sell anything consumable on here. No sales of herb, extract, carts, pens, edibles, drinks, tintcures, anything that’s a consumable product.
  4. DEVICES and ACCESSORIES like a Mighty, Tinymight, some custom glass for a Carta or PuffCo Peak, 510 Mods, log vapes, DIY/One off vapes/pipes/bags/stems/dab tools/Etsy type shit that Etsy bans. That stuff is fine. AT YOUR OWN RISK. And that needs it’s own channel/community(communities) if people are interested in an exchange.
  5. Provide citations/sources for posts/comments where needed.
  6. Openly discuss safety of equipment/devices and cannabis products.
  7. Be mindful of what you post on here. The point is to have the whole server indexed by Google and other search providers and keep the space alive/history documented/growing in the future. (AKA Share Knowledge / Share the vibes. / Don’t get me arrested plz. )

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

And the Vapman Womans, and Vapman Enbies et al

Where's the love?? So lo-tech it makes the Dyna look space-age, and so flavoursome it makes the Mighty cry.

Give it up for the Vapman!

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First time hearing of this, is it in any way comparable to a Vapcap?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Er, I guess?? It's a convection device powered by butane (i.e. torch), so the physics are similar, I suppose. They are both good at small doses, too; but if possible the Vapman is even more analogue than the Vapcap: there is no click, and I've never successfully one-shotted a Vapman. It's more of a flavour-intense, sippin' style conduction vape, while the Dyna is more of a one-hitter. That might be my lack of technique talking, tho. I've nailed my various Vapcap combos, and with an FMJ I can truly get one-heat-cycle extraction; whereas the Vapman is a "heat... was that enough... couple seconds more... still a bit wispy... ah, there we go"

They're a great vape with an impeccable pedigree and a loyal following for good reason; imho criminally under-rated.

Check it out!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Awesome, thanks for the detailed response. Looks like something I need to add to my collection!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

No worries! It's a great vape, I suspect any detractors have not got the technique down pat (altho, as I prove, you don't need to have perfect technique to enjoy it!). It is often described as functional art, and I have to say I can't disagree. It's definitely a connoisseur's vape - not in a snobby way, but those who just want to get from A to B as fast as possible will likely have no truck with it; it's something to be savoured and enjoyed, for those who enjoy the Ritual(tm). If that's you, and you like butane vapes, it's a lock afaiac.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a sharp looking vapman. It has a cult-like following among some for good reason. They've been in business a long time. I remember trying out a Vapman about 8 years ago - it was quite a tasty conduction vape. Although as usual, I totally wouldn't share mine with friends for fear they'd combust haha.

It's a well built device and I totally get why people like it.

Although I personally am a Lotus fan - I much prefer the pure convection heating over the conduction heating of the Vapman. I was so sad when Max announced he was closing Lotus vapes. But it makes me so happy to know that Vapman acquired the rights and started building the Lotus again - I can't wait to add a vapman built copy to my collection some day.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I actually think the Vapman is more forgiving wrt combustion than other butane vapes; I've combusted in all my Dynas, Anvil, and Sticky Brick;. but never in my Vapman. Maybe it's because I'm less confident with my technique, so I tend to creep up on the temp rather than blasting past it.

Heard great things about the Lotus. It's def on my radar; which no other prod vapes really are - think Toad, Tetra etc. I have such a nice collection - altho not super extensive - that I'm not really interested in anything but the niche/artisan vapes now. I think my first TinyMight was order 300-and-something, back in Jan/February 2020; and I've been sold on small makers and craftsmen (Delta… take a bow...) ever since.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I'd agree with that, but I usually don't share butane vapes in general with friends because I'm a flavor chasing snob.

The Lotus is a wild stallion - it's insanely easy to overheat and combust and takes a lot of practice to master draw speeds and torch control. I personally found a figure-8 pattern was optimal, but you gotta keep that torch moving to avoid overheating and burning one section of the flower.

But I've never had a vaporizer that would let me reach the cusp of combustion without flashing over - I loved that vape with a grav-labs j-hook with a pinch of water in the crook to give it a natural perc bubbler that was extremely soothing on the lips with it's purring sensation haha.

The TM is a hell of a beautiful device - I've handled both models quite a bit, but haven't had the chance to add one to my personal collection (I've got literally too many devices in my collection already haha).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hah! I have the GRAV j-hook, and I have to confess I've never put water in it; I can def see the appeal of the eloquently-described purring sensation. As I noted in that other post, I rarely put water in 'water' pieces, but you make it sound eminently attractive.

I have to say I'm surprised the TM hasn't found a home in your bounteous collection. As far as battery portables go, it's pretty nearly end-game for what I would imagine would be a majority of users. There are more powerful vapes, and more beatiful ones, but not available without going on waiting lists and shit; ain't nobody got time for that. Well, maybe I do. But I don't have the budget at this stage.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Lol for sure, the J-hook with a pinch of water and the purring sensation was not only soothing, but it also helped me monitor my draw speeds more precisely which is important for the Lotus.

The TinyMight is indeed an awesome device. But it hit the market about five years too late hahaha. I literally have over two dozen devices in my collection. I have so many high powered units that I don't even handle often (like my original VapeXhale Cloud+ which was a predecessor to the Cloud Evo with an original vertigo hydratube - one of the first hydratubes ever created). Often clients will send me devices for test-fitting parts, and some encourage me to use the devices so that has also given me the ability to handle countless other devices.

Ever heard of a Venus Apollo? Instead of conduction or convection heating, it actually used radiant heat, via a halogen light bulb to cook the herb. It was one hell of a nifty portable device - my biggest complaint was the overly complicated control system ( it would have been a much better device with a more simple control system like the TinyMight )

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Vapman in Kotibe. Damn I love this thing.

The bendy educational thing, wossit, learning curve, is real. i find I have to use it regularly, or I lose the knack; but man this thing is superlative when I'm on point.

load more comments
view more: next ›