LearnedDonkey

I think running against an intelligent black woman who

Her supposed race is both relevant, AND black. That's amazing.

he knows can absolutely take apart any argument he might have, terrifies him.

But if he is racist and misogynistic, and she is supposedly a black woman, then he wouldn't possibly think that. He would, misguidedly of course, consider her a perfect doubly-inferior opponent.

Applying simple logic. Trump can only be one of the following:

1. Genuinely racist and misogynistic.
2. Pretending to be racist and misogynistic.
3. Not racist or misogynistic.

And again, applying simple logic, for this story or your characterization of the situation to be in any way realistic, let alone real, 1 is not an option.

So which one are you (and others here) going to choose, Trump being a misogynistic racist, or this story?

Who am I kidding.. like you're gonna really choose. Do hit me with some incoherent wishful psychoanalysis babble. LMAO.

You guessed wrong. I don't care for either faction of the genocide-enabling uniparty.

Now, do you actually believe that both stipulations:

• Kamala Harris terrifies 'flailing' Trump to the 'point of incoherence'.
• Mary Trump knows this, and is providing factual information.

Do you believe them to be true? LMAO

Looks like self-unaware zero-touch-with-reality echo chambers are going to give us a lot of laughs between now and December.

Imagine actually believing that. LMAO.

While not sexist, Kafala Kamala is right there, especially with how they pronounce both words.

Too bad it won't happen because uniparty Americans are too stupid/ignorant to get the multiple entendres.

I ain't never looking back.

Do we have a RemindMe bot on lemmy? Or maybe the double negative was a Freudian slip 😉

You sound like you fell for some big stereotype-filled detached-from-reality circle jerks, of which, this comment section is one. It actually reminded me for some reason of the Huffington Post's 2016 election predictions. Well, they at least got Texas right. lol.