Kiliyukuxima

I think the question is the other way around: who's not bummed. It's always said to see the best players go, especially one of the very best like Nadal. I just hope djoko can find a bit more fire in him to keep going for a few more years

Ah yes, but he couldn't have known. Why would you retire after just winning a grand slam (👁 ͜ʖ👁)

I think that's what he wanted as well. But his body didn't allow him. He wouldn't even let them throw a proper farewell like the Madrid open did. But we'll, it is what it is

"The one who never was" - it's what I think about Zverev. If only he had a bit more mental strength and discipline, then maybe he could have won a few majors

If you don't have a hobby, start by getting one. One where you need to interact with people, and eventually, you'll meet them and possibly make friends. If you're stuck between work and home, it's hard to meet new people and move on. One can't expect to keep the same friends forever in most y you just have to make new ones because people change

If you like world of warcraft give it a go. It's full of guilds with people older than 30

France is not the EU. This doesn't happen in other European countries because there are rules and proper times to make proper campaigns. I don't even think this is a good thing to joke about Americans because what was done in France was just plain stupid

Yeah. Apart from his game where he could finish the game he played flawlessly. Not sure if djokos knee also didn't help him but even if he was 100% he wouldn't probably have won

Short story is: you can't unless you're rich.

You can get tickets by registering on Wimbledons website. Then there is a public ballot where you can get the chance get the "opportunity" to buy random tickets for a random day (basically) they will assign a random dar/stadium and you'll choose if you want to buy the ticket or not.

The other option is to buy a permanent seat which can cost tens of thousands of pounds. (Whoever has these tickets can sell one day if they wish or can't go).

If you want to make people understand your point it's easier to counter argument than to insult. 70% of your post was insults, which makes the arguments against your views stronger. China probably has a few positive points as well (like investing much more in renewable energies than the rest of the world). So why not use stuff like this?

Just a suggestion, so take it as you will

Tbh at the second part of his career the courts started to get slower so that the games would last longer. So his game really suffered from that and djokos and nadals benefited. So it's an unfair advantage that those 2 had and the story could really be different otherwise

Yeah, I think you should explore different options. She had the same problem and eventually found one med that didn't make her sleepy