This is a very good point. It makes me a bit uneasy, even though it is still better than driverless cars. Aside from this, I also have mixed feelings about the fact that every pound being put into development and purchasing of these busses could have been put into the expansion of existing routes...
And it's not even something that would drastically improve my experience if it was fully successful. Busses are already one of the safest modes, being safer than trains in several countries. Maybe I've missed something and someone can correct me, but this feels like throwing money at technology for technology's sake.
JasminIstMuede
joined 1 week ago
I mean... a form of Microsoft Defender is available for Linux, but only for enterprise customers if I remember correctly 😅
I love it! Is the picture then new?
Really cool picture! These aren't in service anymore, right? Haven't been to Munich in ages.
Thank you for such a detailed explanation! I've always asked myself why the busses in my city get cancelled in the winter but not the trams, and now it makes so much sense :D
Glad the kitty was ok and all ended well 🥰
This is a surprisingly accurate description of the difference between the days where I go to the office and the days where I work from home 😅
2017 a few days before Christmas, dad kicked me out of the house :/
I'm nervous about where this will head. There is just so much potential for abuse, from hackers that just want money to state actors to oppressive regimes. Yes the data is local, but the way it's summarized, pre-classified and apparently nowhere near adequately filtered opens so many potential vectors. And Microsoft seem still adamant about pushing this :/
Unfortunate, but understandable :(
I wish we could rely on good faith with something like this, but it seems the only way is to block as much tracking as possible by force.
Looks to me like this is the case. Did some more searching and found only the same "Intel + Nvidia-GPU or AMD + Nvidia-GPU" formulation.
view more: next ›
I'm actually surprised AGI isn't better defined in the contract, or that there isn't a burden of proof so that they can't lie, but that was definitely on purpose. I really can't imagine them severing that tie though; OpenAI simply isn't financially stable enough, especially in the long term, and I'm sure they know it too.