this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
345 points (85.4% liked)

linuxmemes

21570 readers
498 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] Johanno@feddit.org 6 points 10 hours ago

    Same for people using windows 7

    [–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)
    [–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)
    [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

    Frets On Fire solo

    [–] DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Regardless of us using Linux on our home computers, most businesses and services use Windows machines. Your information is likely still stored on Windows machines elsewhere if you interact with the world at all.

    With that in mind, it's worth being aware of Windows security problems when they come up.

    [–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 hours ago

    Got it, stop interacting with the world

    I was already mostly doing this so

    [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    What would we do when these happen? What could we do in the moment to change anything?

    Join an eventual class action?

    [–] DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

    That's the big "what if" that hangs over everything isn't it?

    [–] Trail@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    Taking the internet into consideration, I would doubt "most".

    [–] egonallanon@lemm.ee 2 points 10 hours ago

    You'd be surprised. For medical info a lot of that is going to be sorted in windows servers running as either file or sql servers.

    [–] Observer1199@lemmy.ml 147 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

    There's absolutely zero need to mention any other OS than Windows if the article is about Windows.

    I guarantee you that 2025 will not be the year of the Linux desktop, just like 2024 wasn't, and just like 2023 wasn't, just like 2022 wasn't...

    Signed,

    Linux users that aren't annoying and aren't driving people away from using Linux with their self-righteous smugness.

    [–] oshu@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

    Been using linux on my desktop since 1999. Don't need an official declaration.

    [–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    i don't see how this is annoying when it is literally posted to a community called "linuxmemes"

    [–] rikudou@lemmings.world 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Nah, 2025 is the year of the Linux on the desktop.

    [–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    we're sure of it this time!

    /s

    [–] rikudou@lemmings.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    I mean, I've been hearing it for 15 years, we can't be wrong for that long, right? Which means that next year it's 100%!

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] Damage@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

    Hey don't give up on 2024 yet

    [–] Monstrosity@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

    Would it even be a good thing if Linux became super main stream? Maybe we should be careful what we wish for.

    [–] rikudou@lemmings.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    How would it be bad? More hardware support, more users not feeding data to corporations, more software support and so on.

    [–] Monstrosity@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

    I'm not sure. I envision a lot of regulatory stuff happening around the kernel as it becomes more popular & vital to infrastructure. As that happens, the direction of it becomes more controlled and eventually maybe becomes unrecognizable.

    But maybe the fact it's open source flat out prevents that?

    I really don't know, I'm not a futurists, I was just internet speculating.

    [–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

    The Linux kernel is already popular & vital to infrastructure, servers and Android exist

    [–] Monstrosity@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

    I thought of a good metaphor even though this thread is basically dead.

    I used to smoke cigarettes. In the State I lived in at the time, Oregon, they taxed cigarettes, but not tobacco. So I learned to roll my own & would make around 80 cigarettes for the equivalent price of a single pack of prefabs.

    Now, because lawmakers aren't generally smokers, this flew under their radar for years. Until it didn't. Then they sewed that loophole up tight pretty quickly.

    Right now Linux is vital to our infrastructure, but I don't think Lawmakers (& Oligarchs) really know that. I guess I'm a little concerned about what happens if they find out.

    [–] Monstrosity@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago

    That's true.

    But Android getting more & more locked down as time goes on is a good example of what I'm afraid of might start happening once there are too many cooks in the kitchen.

    I'm just speculating out of nowhere.

    [–] babybus@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

    This is just a meme in a linuxmemes community. There is no need to be offended.

    [–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    Im sure by next december arch will have 51% of desktop os market share.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 day ago
    [–] foggy@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    If you think being on Linux makes you immune for attacks, I have bad news for you.

    [–] kekmacska@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (7 children)

    there are much less vulrenabilities on Linux. No system is totally unpenetrable, but having 2-5 vulrebabilities is always better than having 30-40

    load more comments (7 replies)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Sometimes Mint tells me there are security updates available. Happened just this morning. Updating makes me feel good :)

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

    And it had the Edge of not installing Candy Crush

    [–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago

    And put edge back in the taskbar.....

    [–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

    And I can do it wherever I want. And my work is in no way interrupted, while the updates go through.

    [–] iopq@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    People here running *nix OSes while I run a Nix*OS

    [–] JasminIstMuede@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    I mean... a form of Microsoft Defender is available for Linux, but only for enterprise customers if I remember correctly 😅

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Is not having an anti-virus good for most people though?

    [–] kekmacska@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    most antivirus apps are very invasive, heavy on resources and even spy on you. Windows defender is usually enough. However, virustotal is still recommended

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

    Anti-virus is not going to stop you from stupidity. You classic "Anti-virus" won't stop anything more than run of the mill simple stuff.

    [–] DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

    Most of the time that's what people need an antivirus for, most attacks the average person will suffer will be some script that's easily caught by the antivirus.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 22 hours ago

    If the script doesn't have permission to do anything it doesn't matter. See Android as an example.

    [–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

    On one side, if you have a brain you're fine.
    On the other side, *glances at general public typing google.com into google* ...yeah

    load more comments
    view more: next ›