I have seen AI apologists talk about how "AI" is already sentient and we shouldn't restrict it because it's immoral.
That straight up killed my desire to interact in ~~that space~~ the community with that person
I have seen AI apologists talk about how "AI" is already sentient and we shouldn't restrict it because it's immoral.
That straight up killed my desire to interact in ~~that space~~ the community with that person
Didn't a lot of traditions start this way? First they solved some problem, then they forgot the problem existed and continued to apply the solution
But it doesn't make your comment glow/move around/whatever the fuck awards did
Which is why you should:
Vec
doubles in size every time it runs out of space)Memory is fairly cheap. Allocation time not so much.
Is this a reference to Bergson v Einstein?
If it is, why am I aware of it?
I can't speak to Sabine's physics content but her social science oriented content is awful:
The capitalism video: short response, long react
I just wanted to use the bot in good faith (me having more money is good) to understand how a process works (the process of me receiving money) :3
Even earlier, the original r/195 was left leaning.
Examples from top of all time:
Pro-socialist mockery of liberals
Cop hatred
Queerposting
Transposting before it was cool
Anti-capitalism
There was a lot more of this. Though nowadays, especially after the disaster, r/196 has lost its leftist edge. There aren't as many posts about world events as there used to be. Or about the people.
I didn't notice that it was the patient's friend's cocktail and got a solid dose of "what the fuck maple leaf country" before I noticed
jizzed 😳
The age old question of do the traps be, in fact, gay
To which the answer is that there is no gay, no straight, nothing makes any fucking sense, everyone is bisexual (or asexual) but also there is no bisexuality (or asexuality)
(1)(3)(5)
Fight me. Also, one of these is a function