37
submitted 13 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19494011

Printed 110 years ago today in The Day Book of Chicago Illinois: https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ndnp/iune/batch_iune_golf_ver01/data/sn83045487/00280761291/1914090701/0164.pdf

Besides the two posted so far, the Library of Congress has another two E. True cartoons printed September 7, 1914:

13
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
12
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
49
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
123
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The cops object when their tools on turned on them

10
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
2
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://dubvee.org/post/1735883

The Department of Justice has amended its antitrust lawsuit against Ticketmaster and Live Nation, alleging that Ticketmaster's introduction of nontransferable tickets and the SafeTix system was primarily intended to stifle competition from rival platforms like StubHub and SeatGeek, rather than merely to reduce ticket fraud. "The complaint, which was amended on Monday after 10 states joined the DOJ's lawsuit, cites internal Ticketmaster documents obtained during the legal process," notes The Verge. From the report:

In 2019, Ticketmaster rolled out SafeTix, which replaced static barcodes on electronic tickets with encrypted barcodes that refresh every 15 seconds. Ticketmaster marketed SafeTix as a way of reducing ticket fraud, but the complaint claims reducing competition was âoea primary motivationâ for the new ticketing system. [...] The amended complaint includes new information about Ticketmaster's dominance of the events market. One internal Live Nation document cited in the complaint notes that Ticketmaster is the primary ticketer for approximately 80 percent of arenas across the country that host NBA or NHL teams. As of 2022, Live Nation-promoted events accounted for 70 percent of all amphitheater shows across the country, according to internal Live Nation events mentioned in the complaint.

The DOJ alleges that because of Ticketmaster's conduct, consumers have âoepaid more and continue to pay more for fees relating to tickets to live events than they would have paid in a free and open competitive market.â The exact amount of monetary harm is still unknown, the complaint claims, and will require discovery from Ticketmaster and Live Nation's books, as well as from its third-party competitors.

2
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Return of the Obra Diner

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Rules for thee but not for me

[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago

Not sure about that case specifically, but in general lack of regulation unleashes enshittificatory impulses. This comment may be aimed more at conservative voters or politicians to convince them (or at least let them claim) that pro-consumer regulation actually harms “consumer welfare.”

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Second the suggestion of credit unions, but to be clear they’re neither charities nor non-profits; they’re member co-ops, run for the benefit of members (instead of stockholders), in which each member gets one vote (instead of each share of stock having one vote).

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Oh look, it’s Mira Murati!

[-] [email protected] 41 points 2 months ago

If anyone believed in the imperial presidency it was Hamilton

[-] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Bostrom…possessed one of those elusive, rather abstract personalities that perhaps lend credence to the simulation theory.

What a sick, understated burn

[-] [email protected] 26 points 4 months ago

maybe some women?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

I understand why anti-Zionism is not antisemitism (as many on the right claim). I also understand why claiming that it is is itself antisemitic (since it plays to the old antisemitic conspiracy theory all Jews are secretly loyal to Israel and ignores the many anti-Zionist Jews). But I don’t understand the message of this post. Could you explain it to me like I’m five? Genuine question.

view more: next ›

HailSeitan

joined 5 months ago