Rules for thee but not for me
Not sure about that case specifically, but in general lack of regulation unleashes enshittificatory impulses. This comment may be aimed more at conservative voters or politicians to convince them (or at least let them claim) that pro-consumer regulation actually harms “consumer welfare.”
Second the suggestion of credit unions, but to be clear they’re neither charities nor non-profits; they’re member co-ops, run for the benefit of members (instead of stockholders), in which each member gets one vote (instead of each share of stock having one vote).
Oh look, it’s Mira Murati!
If anyone believed in the imperial presidency it was Hamilton
No part of the law prohibits having, say, a Pride-themed Ten Commandments printed on a leather daddy’s naked chest in glorious Comic Sans.
Bostrom…possessed one of those elusive, rather abstract personalities that perhaps lend credence to the simulation theory.
What a sick, understated burn
maybe some women?
I understand why anti-Zionism is not antisemitism (as many on the right claim). I also understand why claiming that it is is itself antisemitic (since it plays to the old antisemitic conspiracy theory all Jews are secretly loyal to Israel and ignores the many anti-Zionist Jews). But I don’t understand the message of this post. Could you explain it to me like I’m five? Genuine question.
Return of the Obra Diner