ElmerFudd

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

He literally just got the endorsement of one of the biggest trade unions in the world, who said he does more than any other president for the workers. It's pretty early for endorsements, maybe you'll be right, but we'll have to wait to see.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No, you're confused, bro. ‘Liberal’ is both a political identifier people use for themselves and others, and a series of policies and political ideals. Neoliberalism is a series of economic policies practiced by conservatives, regardless of the (D) or (R) next to their names. If we were going to describe someone as a neoliberal, which people generally do not, the person being described would be almost the exact opposite of someone who would be described as liberal. The thing you said about being fiscally one way and socially another isn't the definition of neoliberalism, that's just an old line people say when they're ashamed of being conservative and don't want to come off dumb.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Neoliberal economic policies have nothing to do with liberal social policies. They are as linked as the German Nationalist Socialist Party was to socialist economic policies. Whenever these two words come up, someone invariably links the two as though they are spiritual cousins, and I don't like that. It should be very clearly stated each time these words are conflated, or compared, that neoliberalism ~~liberal~~, and that people who would describe themselves as liberal are entirely against neoliberal economic policies, which are largely carried out by corrupted politicians on both sides of the political aisle. Lest we mince words; neoliberals are at the opposite end of the political spectrum to liberals.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Tell us you don't know what "neoliberal" means without telling us.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

He's immune to factual criticism, because righties live and die in their own fantasy land; where bad is good (as long as they're doing it).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Haha, you must be so cool. Do you think everything on television is all lies, all the time? Like when a young person tells an old person about a fact they learned online, only to hear the old person gripe: "oh sure, because you read it on the internet it must true". That's one ignorant take.

I'm gonna go back to not knowing you, never talk to you again, and live a productive life. Enjoy your trolling, basement man!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Can vouch, my great great grandma used to cook chitlins for El Rocha's ancestors.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To add to your point: I once saw a TV show where they got drivers to smoke weed and drive a basic obstacle course, They presented stats saying drunk drivers were (iirc) 6x more likely to crash, while cannabis use was associated with a 2x higher likelihood to crash. So, while it is technically safer, it is definitely not safe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Who could forget such intriguing comments as: "This.", or "Inb4 [x thing happens]", et al.