It's completely necessary.
How else does one click hotkeys while standing?
It's completely necessary.
How else does one click hotkeys while standing?
A lot of this sounds familiar.
I just wonder of this is actually going to have a similar effect. Controversial decision but I'm pretty used to seeing companies get away with shitty choices.
Or maybe nonprofit organizations. Though I'm having a harder time imagining why they'd need a social network site, especially if it's federated with our shit posting "sublemmies" or whatever we're calling them here.
I'm just trying to find the snack bar.
Unfortunately, the reality is that it may become necessary.
Donations can be a saving grace if enough people donate regularly. But such is dependent on people's willingness, their own financial stability, and how stressed servers are (how much it'll cost to upgrade and/or maintain infrastructure.)
It's great if it's viable. Means there's less outside influence. But that's if.
As far as I'm aware, Wikipedia has been able to maintain it purely off donations. But I'm not sure if Lemmy could.
Maybe? One thing Lemmy does have going for it is that the majority of users seem to be aware how... Fragile? the fediverses can be. There's arguably more passion behind the users and maybe willing to throw support out.
But hard to say.
Tell me about this "Digg." It sounds so familiar, but I don't think I actually ever used anything called Digg.
Thankfully, they'll remind you wh- oh wait.
Always some going off in early July and late June.
Shame about World's stability issues. Probably brought on by its popularity.
Do you think Lemmy knows what a "JPEG" is? It just wants a picture of a god dang hotdog.
Looks like an excellent way to earn a broken freakin' neck.