Danterious

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I found it. You have to press the communities tab at the top of your instance and press all

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Is there a way to see all the communities on your instances c/all?

Edit: Nvm it is at the top of the page.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is why both safe spaces and public spaces are needed so that ideas/behaviors have one place to form/grow and another to negotiate with other ideas/behaviors.

The way that each of these spaces is moderated becomes important.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's why I included the words informal, but I get your point I hope it doesn't become too bureaucratic and is just a place for admins to build trust and communication with each other so federation/defederation is a more conscious decision.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Safe spaces are tools. Tools can be used for good and bad.

The same way that terrorists use E2EE chats doesn't mean that we should ban them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think you would like this video.

Social rationality

Edit: by the way I think you bring an interesting viewpoint and I thank you for the effort put into this comment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly the point that I wanted to get across.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

lemmy.world users can't see the Beehaw community.

Edit: And I have only posted this in two communities.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That’s fair. I would hope that someone who has a genuine constructive criticism would be able to communicate it, but it might not hurt to have a rule reminding them to acknowledge and affirm the core concept before providing criticism. I can see how someone being a little curt and just voicing the criticism might come across as being anti- whatever the topic is.

They don't necessarily have to outright right say I agree with the core concept in every comment but instead they could add on to what is being said. For example, if someone came to me with real criticism about an idea I had but didn't at least try to offer anything on how to make the idea better it can come across in an online forum as being contrarian or argumentative instead of constructive.

No disrespect to the folks at beehaw, I may still make an alt account there. I appreciate what they’ve built, but it wasn’t the best fit for what I was looking to join. Ideally I’d be able to participate in their communities with this account, but I totally understand why they defederated with lemmy.world.

That's fine but I mean why not join an instance that is federated with both of them?

Edit: wording

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I actually cross-posted this post into Beehaw's chat community, but thanks for the suggestion.

Also, in an online forum at least, it is really hard to decipher intent so the actual content of the text matters a lot. so communicating criticisms without adding anything more than that just leads to the conversation not going anywhere.

PS: In a slightly unrelated question why did you decide to stay on lemmy.world since it seems like you might want to discuss with the Beehaw community as well?

view more: ‹ prev next ›