Bach37strad

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Something something mitochondria

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's actually Odo

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hey man, it's called being a wine enthusiast.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

Or Feb 29th

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Vessel... Wessel...wesley...!... Shutup Wesley!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We live inside a dream. But who is the dreamer?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

I bet he bleaches his wormhole.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

... Water...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Delays in network infrastructure. While most signals going between large nodes/hubs will be fiber optic, there's quite a few old school copper connections between you and the time server that will slow things down. My ping to my closest node, with all my fiber and cat5e connections is still 20ms.

You're probably better off using a cellphone time than a desktop computer to a website, since the cell network accounts for the difference in time dilation between us and the satellites (Einsteinien relativity amitright?) supposedly well enough for network infrastructure to work.

You're also getting to "is the processor in the watch fast enough" territory. That's a bit beyond me though.

 

Looking for a watch with a less busy dial than my edifice, while maintaining the same functionality. Multiple pill alarms and countdown timer are important to me, and I do love solar and multiband.

Personally I like the field style dial of the m100(right), but I like the case and dial size better on the m170 (left).

Thoughts?

view more: next ›