@Camus

Le ministre de la réussite scolaire a voté contre les repas à 1 euro pour les étudiants. Ça promet.

#France

https://datan.fr/deputes/rhone-69/depute_alexandre-portier/votes

@Kirilov @wrack @gimulnautti @ymishory @appassionato @palestine

Yes, I did. Why? You wish to change the subject and discuss confirmation bias now?

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]

You implore me, I comply. The link you provided say the same thing I just told you, the logical fallacy you mention consists in appealing to people with no expert knowledge on the issue, and therefore does not apply to this particular case, as I keep telling you, since Khalidi is a qualified expert.

@Kirilov @argumento @gimulnautti @KarunaX @ymishory @appassionato @bookstodon @palestine
Yes, and saying you expect a rigorous work from an historian with good academic credentials is not a logical fallacy.
If we followed your logic, we should discard all opinions coming from experts renowned in their particular field, because that would be an appeal to authority.
Basing one's assessment on solid work is not the same as citing a public figure with no expert knowledge on the issue.

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
If they did, you could easily demonstrate it, since it's logic, instead of just claiming there is a logical fallacy.
Karuna said he expected a rigorous work, because the author is known to produce rigorous work. That's perfect logic.

@Kirilov @gimulnautti @KarunaX @ymishory @appassionato @bookstodon @palestine

These textbook examples do not apply here, for the reason I mentioned.

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
It seems logical to me to expect solid work from someone known for producing solid work, and I see no fallacy here.