0
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The Hundred Years' War on Palestine
A History of Settler Colonial Conquest and Resistance, 1917-2017 by Rashid Khalidi

A landmark history of one hundred years of war waged against the Palestinians from the foremost US historian of the Middle East, told through pivotal events and family history.

@bookstodon
@palestine
#Palestine
#history
#RashidKhalidi

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] “An argument from authority, also called an appeal to authority, or argumentum ad verecundiam, is a form of argument in which the opinion of an influential figure is used as evidence to support an argument.

All sources agree this is not a valid form of logical proof, that is to say, that this is a logical fallacy”

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]

  1. Argumentum ad populum and fallacy of authority are not the same, you pompous prick.

  2. You are making general opinions on a book you haven't read, based only in your inability to grasp the title.

3.You wouldn't call a book titled "History of World War 2" biased. Why do you call a book that tells the story of the 100 years resistance to colonialism in Palestine biased? It was a war, by any definition

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] They both apply. I have absolutely read Khalidi. It’s a fine text but that is not what we are talking about here. We are talking about logical fallacies.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

@Kirilov @argumento @gimulnautti @KarunaX @ymishory @appassionato @bookstodon @palestine
Yes, and saying you expect a rigorous work from an historian with good academic credentials is not a logical fallacy.
If we followed your logic, we should discard all opinions coming from experts renowned in their particular field, because that would be an appeal to authority.
Basing one's assessment on solid work is not the same as citing a public figure with no expert knowledge on the issue.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]

Why don't you illuminate us with an explanation of how a fallacy of authority fits the statement "I know Rashid Khalidi has good academic credentials as an historian, I expect his work to be rigorous". I'd be delighted to read your explanation.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]

You implore me, I comply. The link you provided say the same thing I just told you, the logical fallacy you mention consists in appealing to people with no expert knowledge on the issue, and therefore does not apply to this particular case, as I keep telling you, since Khalidi is a qualified expert.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

bookstodon group

1 readers
2 users here now

I'm a group about bookstodon. Follow me to get all the group posts. Tag me to share with the group. Create other groups by searching for or tagging @[email protected]

founded 11 months ago