this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
137 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4801 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 year ago

Yup. Totally a lib. They should vote him out and start the circus back up for another 3 weeks

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Of course the right attacks him for the one decent thing that he's said.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hang on, before we give him credit for decency, remember that he only said it because it personally affects him. He has a black son. He knows firsthand what minorities experience and how policing is systemically racist. He saw the video of George Floyd's murder and could imagine his son suffer a similar fate. His reaction was exactly what you would expect from any father. It's not progressivism or decency, but self defense. All conservatives are inherently narcissistic. They support the conservative ideals that benefit themselves, and are radically progressive on any issue where the status quo does not benefit themselves.

Or to put it another way, Conservativism has exactly one priority: self. It is egocentrism in the guise of stoic protection of the status quo. This becomes obvious the very moment a conservative does not benefit from the status quo, and they wish to change the world to improve their own standing in it.

There is no hypocrisy in conservativism because there is no objective standard or ideology beyond protecting and promoting the self, and the self is whatever conservatives decide exists within the self. The self is good, and the other is bad. Everything else is negotiable.

To someone who is not conservative, this looks like hypocrisy. See: The only Moral Abortion is My Abortion, or The Card Says Moops, or Gun Control for Black Panthers, or My Daughter is a LGBTQ+ so now LGBTQ+ are People, or It isn't "Drag" when I do it, or But my state deserves FEMA Funding, or Regulate this industry because it is a threat to me, or My sex scandal is a private matter so please respect my privacy, or Election fraud exists and I'll prove it, or I'm a job creator so please bail me out, or just take literally any conservative talking point and you will find conservatives who are suddenly the exception to their own rule.

That's the feature of conservativism that is so appealing. It's like having a personal God that will forgive any transgression as long as you believe and pray for forgiveness. Being part of the self is like a warm blanket, and as long as you agree to maintain the farce, you get to stay under its protection.

This isn't new information. Conservatives have always existed, under different banners and with different definitions of the self. Trump has laid bare the grift, abusing it past the point of credibility. That's his hold, that to oust Trump is to abandon the ruse, and conservatives can't do that. That's why they will try very hard to make him a member of the Other. They will claim they were duped, that he was a secret Democrat, that he was never one of them. But he was always one of them, even when he was a Democrat.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I posted this in my own comment but this is the right trying to mitigate that video that links him to overthrowing the government. This is to try and get the left to like him. Or at least tolerate him.

They’re running a psyops game.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Translation:

Christofascist wingnuts imply that Christofascist wingnut with odious views who they elected themselves does not espouse views that are odious enough.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

More news from the leopards eating faces party. Speaker of leopards eating faces party was surprised when the leopards ate his face.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

He looks like his voice put his face to sleep.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

The reaction eats its young as well