this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
264 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37719 readers
454 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryTesla says it has received requests for information and subpoenas from the US Department of Justice related to potential personal benefits violations, the advertised range of its vehicles and personnel decisions.

The Wall Street Journal in September reported that federal prosecutors are investigating perks provided to Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk going back as far back as 2017, including a project described as a glass house for Musk.

Earlier this year, Reuters reported that Tesla had created a special “diversions team” to avoid dealing with complaints from customers about their vehicle ranges.

The filing warned of “the possibility of a material adverse impact on our business” should the government pursue an enforcement action.

The subpoenas add to a mounting number of government probes into the electric-vehicle maker.

In September, the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued Tesla alleging that it has been “tolerating widespread and ongoing racial harassment of its Black employees” at its Fremont, California, plant.


Saved 21% of original text.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Tough shit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

@Five I see no downside to the Incel’s car business being investigated.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

@Five Cry me a river Elon Musk

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

@Five hahahahahahahahahaha, we wouldn't want that 😄

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@aral @Five How many billions did deliberately making misleading claims cost VW, again?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@ianbetteridge @aral @Five For those wondering just like me, the answer is a bit complicated, but in terms of settlements paid:

On 28 June 2016, Volkswagen agreed to pay $15.3 billion to settle the various public and private civil actions in the United States, the largest settlement ever of an automobile-related consumer class action in United States history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_emissions_scandal#Private_actions

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@noodlejetski @aral @Five reminds me of Reservoir Dogs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@noodlejetski @aral @Five The cutest version 😆

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Five I get a kick out of the #liberal people still defending #tesla

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I get a kick out of liberal people defending liberals.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@Five So put into 5 words it's Tesla admitting:"Every single word is true"? I've no idea why else it should have "adverse impact". And if so, it SHOULD have that impact – to keep others at bay and protect those who're not billionaire man-babies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@Five lying is another word for marketing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@Five like his cars, Elon comes up short.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@Five
Musk managed that mayerial adverse impact on our business on his own!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@Five

The SEC might also look into the question, whether repeated false claims about Tesla's self-driving capabilities had an impact on the company's share price.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@Five

As the saying goes, "tough shit."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@Five I feel like that's only possible if they actually did ...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›