I mean if it gives one of them the chance instead of allowing you the guaranteed win… one would be foolish to not do it really.
this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
111 points (91.1% liked)
Gaming
3111 readers
369 users here now
!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.
Our Rules:
1. Keep it civil.
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.
2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.
I should not need to explain this one.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.
Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Logo uses joystick by liftarn
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
OP claims to be in the lead, yet will not defend his crown from all comers.
Curious.
Honestly i used to love those last couple minutes of a match when you'd have to 3v1 your buddies.
And if I’m on my last stock at 150% you can be damn sure I’m gonna try and take them with me.
Plus, if you can’t handle an impromptu handicap, do you really deserve the title anyways?!
It depends on who's got the stocks, in my opinion. I personally don't like when the 4-player 5-stock casual game turns into the sweatiest 2-stock 1v1 that lasts 10 minutes.
It's then that I notice the one calling out the other dude only has 1 and eliminate him.