Seems like a good start, but I wonder why it doesn't include judicial.
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
82 points (100.0% liked)
U.S. News
2242 readers
91 users here now
News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.
Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Post the original source of information as the link.
- If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
- Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
- Social media is not a news source.
For World News, see the News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Don't worry it has 0 chance of passing.
It could, because the requirements will be laughable. This is just a way for them to obfuscate their investment via a third party while virtue signaling.
It's also a way for them to finger point during election season.
Finger pointing! That is definitely something a politician excels at.
"They aren't my stocks, they're my wife's/husband's/daughter's/son's" - every politician
"my wealth manager does all that stuff, sure we have a weekly golf game together, but that doesn't affect the trades he makes"
Something like this requires a constitution amendment...
view more: next ›