People want their answers to be simple. In this case, if you can say there's a good side and a bad side in a conflict, you can pretend that verbally supporting the good side no matter what is good, moral praxis.
Socialism
Beehaw's community for socialists, communists, anarchists, and non-authoritarian leftists (this means anti-capitalists) of all stripes. A place for all leftist and labor news and discussion, as long as you're nice about it.
Non-socialists are welcome to come to learn, though it's hard to get to in-depth discussions if the community is constantly fighting over the basics. We ask that non-socialists please be respectful and try not to turn this into a "left vs right" debate forum by asking leading questions or by trying to draw others into a fight.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
There's also the same question the other way around. People seem to have real trouble when they can't find identifiable goodies and baddies in this conflict. So they close their eyes to what they don't want to see.
You Can’t Selectively Pay Attention To Certain Atrocities And Ignore All The Others
Rather the opposite: you can't pay attention to all atrocities, there are too many of them going on, all at the same time.
Rationalizing atrocities is a separate issue, but ignoring most of them... that's just attention spans and media filters as usual.
Bigotry is the answer.