!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
Theresa May essentially did this while she was Home Secretary in the UK. It was the trigger of the whole "Windrush Scandal", after it was revealed that the official paperwork of dozens hundreds of naturalised citizens was shredded without any record being made.
It caused people, most of whom were well into old-age to be deported, have their passports confiscated, and be denied access to healthcare services.
Jesus Christ π
Real talk: if they're at the point of destroying records to justify it, it will not matter if they actually did succeed in destroying them or not, your best case scenario becomes a quick deportation and worst a concentration camp. Legal justification will not be a blocker.
When it comes to fascism, the rule of law only matters to them when it works in their favor. The rest of the time it's simply ignored.
I'm not sure at that point that they would care. Why do all that when they can just deport people and block them at the points of entry. They could deport a citizen, turn off their passport, and if they show back up detain them for fraudulent ID documents and then either deport them again or send them to the concentration camp for "hard cases".
Burning the naturalization documents assumes they even care about courts and bring people in front of them.
That said it would be a massive risk. If they didn't do about a hundred things right the first time they'd end up quickly removed from office by a mob, escorted by the very NG troops sent to stop them. Americans care about citizenship, but that goes both ways. Removing that without due process would lead to activism and if that's not disrupted properly they get the bad ending. If they fail to secure the capital, it ends badly. If they fail to secure congress, it ends badly. If they fail to ensure wins in the 2026 and 2028 elections, it ends badly. (and not holding those elections also ends badly, like a civil war at best)
So they'll most likely continue to use the path they used in Trump's first term. They'll challenge naturalization documents in court. The good news is courts are slow and dockets fill up fast. There's only so much they can do with that.
The good news is courts are slow and dockets fill up fast. Thereβs only so much they can do with that.
But executive orders are legal until a judge strikes it down... so... π
that doesn't sound good... π
I know, that's why I was talking about the political consequences of doing stuff. I fully expect there will be illegally fast deportations for anyone they believe is undocumented. Citizens and green card holders need to keep their documents and copies of their documents accessible in case they get swept up in that, (It's happened before). But actually going after citizens and green card holders as the objective, without due process, creates a lot of problems for them. And they have 13 million undocumented people to work through with a system capable of doing 2 million in a 4 year period right now. It's entirely possible they just never get to the next part of their list.
They could just rack up any reason they can think of to deport people.
"You're a terrorist, get out" which was actually a thing in the 2000s in America.
"We think you're not paying anything, get out"
I mean they must have a roulette wheel somewhere to spin and whatever it lands on, is their reason to deport you.
They can order anything they feel like ordering. Whether it's legal or whether anyone capitulates to it are entirely different questions.
key word: feasibly
That word is meaningless in a country where a literally retarded felon is president and domestic policy is decided by a south african narcissist.
Well the president is immune from prosecution thanks to the corrupt SCOTUS. He could destroy them but he'd have to do it himself
Yeah... Not really.
Let's think this through. If the president has immunity, then any order he gives falls under the same immunity.
If I tell you to steal, and anything I say is legal, you stealing would fall under that umbrella. What I tell you to do can't be legal if you doing it is illegal.
Iβm pretty sure βacting lawfullyβ and βhaving immunity from prosecution for illegal actionsβ are two different things. Just because the president cannot be prosecuted does not change the fundamental nature of the deed, only the consequences thereof.
Yeah this is wrong at least when it comes to the military UCMJ allows you to disregard an unlawful order. Nuremberg confirmed that i was just following orders doesn't fly at least in the military. Immunity doesn't make it legal it just makes the person uncountable and shows how broken the system is.
I've heard this being discussed for green cards too. Very scary!
I wish I had somewhere to be deported to.
Nowhere to deport to? ~~Internment~~ Concentration Camp you go!
π
...
π
Concentration camp? Weird way to talk about the Freedom Camps
I thought I was here to learn how to concentrate!
What's that? Sure, I wouldn't mind a shower
won't be the first or last time they deport citizens