106
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Stella Assange speaking to the Luxembourg Parliament on the persecution of Julian Assange

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 27 points 11 months ago

I always love that people go on and on about "he shared government secrets!" and always convientantly leave out that those "secrets" included that we were "double tapping" targets and killing aid workers and reporters arriving on the scene after the first strike. Or the video of the Apache gunning down a reporter and laughing about it.

But Julian is the evil one. Right....

[-] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

A young and talented photo-journalist, Namir Noor-Eldeen, and his driver, Saeed Chmagh, both Reuters employees, were gunned down by a US Apache on 12 July 2007 in the Al-Amin neighbourhood of eastern Baghdad, along with a number of other people on the street. Saeed was wounded and tried to crawl away, only to be shot dead along with the passer-by who stopped his van to help him. Two children in the vehicle were severely wounded. WikiLeaks revealed what really happened that day when they published the Apache footage in 2010 under the name of Collateral Murder, along with the Rules of Engagement in use at the time. Julian is charged with publishing the Iraq RoE (count 14) but not the video. This means the video won’t be shown in court as evidence. It would presumably be too embarassing to the US government to show the footage in court.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Please keep posting this stuff. I haven't seen the video in years, but I can still clearly remember it. We need to not let the world forget about the atrocities committed and stop turning the issue into something else. The entire Assange saga has all been over someone embarrassing us and not about the crimes we happily committed. It's crazy that we pay more attention to him than WAR CRIMES(oh right, it's not an official "war" 🙄....)

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Thank you! I plan to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Remember Julian Assange is in a high security prison without conviction awaiting extradition to the US where the conditions he will be incarcerated in will be even worse. He will be burried in the prison with no contact to his friends or family while being tried in the 'espionage court' where he is charged. The long-term threat of these conditions have amounted to psychological torture, resulting in a medical state that could end his life at any moment. Julian is literally hanging by a thread. His limited contact with his wife and 2 young children are literally his life line. He won't have that in US prison. This is a matter of life and death. Torturers torture to intimidate. In Julian's case it is to intimidate everyone else and in particular the press, so they won't do what he did and expose serious state criminality to the world. The purpose is to avoid accountability and avoid facing justice.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Remember: the indictment of Julian relates to 2010-2011 publications only: the Afghanistan War Logs, Iraq War Logs, Diplomatic Cables, Guantanamo Bay Detainee Briefs. The charges have nothing to do with the 2016 release of Podesta/Clinton’s emails, or with Russia.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

As much of a PoS Assange is, he would've been treated the same even without all the elections interfering.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Well, he did help Trump being elected by releasing Clinton’s emails, in exchange of a pardon he didn’t obtain.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

Remember the indictment of Julian relates to 2010-2011 publications only: the Afghanistan War Logs, Iraq War Logs, Diplomatic Cables, Guantanamo Bay Detainee Briefs. The charges have nothing to do with the 2016 release of Clinton's emails, or with WL allegedly helping Hillary loose the election to Trump.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Absolutely.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

So he publicised that Clinton was illegally managing her emails while in public office (while simultaneously exonerating her of the accusations that Trump actually made) and that means he's politically aligned with Trump? The guy's a journalist, he pisses off everyone, that's how you know he's good.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

It doesn’t mean he’s aligned with Trump ideology.

It means he’s corruptable

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
106 points (83.5% liked)

Videos

5628 readers
1 users here now

Neat vids from youtube or wherever. Rules later

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS